Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
Because its a British company and this occurred in the Dominican Republic I don't know what the legalities are but it should be obvious that a 'honeymoon resort' is, surprise, surprise, going to cater to heterosexual couples, not lesbians. If any resort starts allowing same-sex couples pretending that they're 'married' to be included in honeymoon events they are definitely going to start losing the vast majority (98%) of heterosexual couples that don't care to have other peoples sexual perversion and mockery of marriage shoved in their face during what should be a very pleasant time of their life. Zero sympathy here for these females. They want the world to pretend they are 'normal' and 'married'. They are not normal and their ersatz 'marriage' is like spitting into the face of heterosexual couples who chose to wed. No wonder they were excluded. They shouldn't have been there.
67 posted on 09/21/2011 3:18:03 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Scott

Agreed. The company in question would be fools to cater to this minuscule group of potential customers.


70 posted on 09/21/2011 3:22:21 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson