To: NYer
Because its a British company and this occurred in the Dominican Republic I don't know what the legalities are but it should be obvious that a 'honeymoon resort' is, surprise, surprise, going to cater to heterosexual couples, not lesbians. If any resort starts allowing same-sex couples pretending that they're 'married' to be included in honeymoon events they are definitely going to start losing the vast majority (98%) of heterosexual couples that don't care to have other peoples sexual perversion and mockery of marriage shoved in their face during what should be a very pleasant time of their life. Zero sympathy here for these females. They want the world to pretend they are 'normal' and 'married'. They are not normal and their ersatz 'marriage' is like spitting into the face of heterosexual couples who chose to wed. No wonder they were excluded. They shouldn't have been there.
67 posted on
09/21/2011 3:18:03 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
To: Jim Scott
Agreed. The company in question would be fools to cater to this minuscule group of potential customers.
70 posted on
09/21/2011 3:22:21 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson