Just like the last debate where the liberal media pushed that the GOP wants people to die, this is their next attempt to smear. It's ironic that they don't realize that military support for the GOP is more than 2 to 1. Or they don't mention that Republican families join the military at far greater rates than Democrats do.
To: SideoutFred
Did the soldier get booed immediately? I recall Santorum being cheered for his answer. Now I have to watch that section again.
2 posted on
09/22/2011 11:32:34 PM PDT by
Netizen
(Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
To: SideoutFred
Santorum hit that question out of the park. You gotta love Rick.
3 posted on
09/22/2011 11:33:54 PM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: SideoutFred
I wish people wouldn’t boo or cheer at these things. Let the answers come, and let viewers sit there and think for themselves.
We are right on so many issues, but those we hope to sway back off at such displays.
No, I’m not talking about preventing freedom of expression. I’m just recalling how when I wasn’t as conservative as I am now, listening to the answers, and then later then the MSM flipped out over certain things, I’d think “That’s not how I received that answer.”
The cheering and such makes it so much more like a lib feel-good event, instead of an opportunity to hear responses. And I don’t care if someone’s gay or whatever, if they’re a soldier they deserve to say what they have to say, even if it’s stupid.
5 posted on
09/22/2011 11:40:10 PM PDT by
Darkwolf377
(undecided)
To: SideoutFred
I’ll try to translate the homo speak...”can I, as a gay person, prance around in tight pink shirts, while marching with my partner and a gun and those who oppose my fabulous lifestyle should be punished?”
6 posted on
09/22/2011 11:41:39 PM PDT by
max americana
(FUBO NATION 2012 FK BARAK)
To: SideoutFred
The social issues haven’t been discussed enough in the debates.
The two Ricks will tear Romney to pieces if they ever remember to mention the taxpayer-funded abortion coverage in RomneyCare.
8 posted on
09/22/2011 11:52:46 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Anybody but Baracchio in 2012)
To: SideoutFred
It seems that he thinks the military care’s about “who I am” Its not about him personally. Not a social club. Its to protect the country and fight, break and kill things...Perhaps he needs a new occupation, outside of the military... The military really doesn't care about “who” a heterosexual is either. They should be caring about weather they can win and war and come home safe.. Its not about the individual, but the team, and also I'll watch your back and you watch mine..(with our clothes on).
To: SideoutFred
it won’t be long before the left pushes for affirmative action for having a certain number of homos in the military .. having homo marriages at the base chapel with the newly married couple walking together under the sword arch and then all the homos partying all night at the officer’s club.. it’s coming soon to a military base near you
To: SideoutFred
In a video submission, Stephen Hill told the Republican presidential candidates that he "had to lie about who he was" when he was deployed to Iraq in 2010 because of his sexual orientation, and his fear that he would "lose my job."Lie about who he was? What is it about being gay that REQUIRES him to mention "who he is?" What is it about the military that REQUIRES him to lie?
18 posted on
09/23/2011 12:28:28 AM PDT by
Lady Lucky
(Heavy the head that wears the tiara.)
To: SideoutFred
Who's the idiot that chose Chris Wallace, Bret Baier, and Megyn Kelly to ask the questions?
How more liberal can you get?
How about getting some intelligent people to ask questions?
Fox news does have intelligent reporters, such as Sean Hannity, Oliver North, and Monica Crowley.
Wasn't that snobbish liberal Chris Wallace FIRED from ABC for his stinking liberal bias?
How can Fox News be so stupid?
21 posted on
09/23/2011 1:02:02 AM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's simple: Fight or Die)
To: SideoutFred
That’s part of the probem. He thinks it’s just a job.
To: SideoutFred
I didn`t watch it, so my question is, was it the soldier or the open homosexuality issue that was booed? There is a huge difference.
That said, these audience reactions could be costly to the GOP.
27 posted on
09/23/2011 1:30:13 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(With "successes" like the Libya adventure, who needs failure?)
To: SideoutFred
The LA Times doesn't know DADT was repealed? The guy told everyone he was gay and the crowd expressed what they thought of it. As the gays so boldly said--GET OVER IT!
29 posted on
09/23/2011 1:46:30 AM PDT by
Irenic
To: SideoutFred
I’m not interested in a homosexual’s love life. Not at all. Having them push their sexuality on me is open sexual harassment and invites an appropriate response.
40 posted on
09/23/2011 4:51:34 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: SideoutFred
“Don’t ask don’t tell” was one of Clinton’s notions, and Santorum wants re-instate it.
To: SideoutFred
All this suggests the so called soldier—and his question were a set up. I have no doubts “they Know” all this and are still trying to drive wedges — the old divide and conquer tactic.
42 posted on
09/23/2011 6:13:11 AM PDT by
StonyBurk
(ring)
To: SideoutFred
45 posted on
09/23/2011 6:20:28 AM PDT by
RetSignman
(It's Fall...the "Goebbles Warmers" are packing their bags , migrating for their winter caves.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson