To: Evil Slayer
And of course we don't have a functional antimissile defense system capable of reducing it to small harmless pieces.
After spending how much?
65 posted on
09/23/2011 11:48:37 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
To: Carry_Okie
Forget an anti-missile defense system. How about a good old fashioned self-destruct mechanism? Would a battery and a detonator, of some kind, aboard cost as much as damages paid if this sucker lands on people?
71 posted on
09/23/2011 11:59:15 AM PDT by
ClearBlueSky
(Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
To: Carry_Okie
The function of the antimissile defense system is simply to cause the incoming warhead to miss its target and/or fail to detonate when it gets there.
Got that stuff going, but plumb forgot to put the Hoover in the package to clean up.
Sorry about that.
73 posted on
09/23/2011 12:04:06 PM PDT by
Unrepentant VN Vet
((485 and a wakeup) Truth, I know, always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition.)
To: Carry_Okie
87 posted on
09/23/2011 12:37:46 PM PDT by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(PDS=someone that doesnt dream dates up of a Palin announcement;nor act as Palins campaign manager)
To: Carry_Okie
So then you’d have double or triple the amount of junk falling? Yeah good plan. :)
152 posted on
09/23/2011 5:23:43 PM PDT by
Larry Lucido
(I can only be series in a parallel universe.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson