FreeRepublic is becoming more and more polarized. It’s not enough that you agree 60% with someone, 70%, 80%, or even 90%. It’s now all or nothing.
So Dr. K likes Romney. Okay, one man’s opinion. Big deal. But, the outrage here by some is so childlike. Are you going to take your ball and go home now?
I’m 75% in agreement with Romney on the policies he’s brought forward. I’m 95% confident in his abilities. If he were the GOP nominee I’d vote for him. He’s far better than Obama, and that’s all that matters to me now.
Well, up until now he has been distinctly and extremely negative on Romney. Now he thinks Romney is the “most conservative” who can win, because the facts on the ground are now different -- presumably because of Perry's poor debate performances.
As an objective matter, Dr. K's statement may be correct or incorrect. So then the factual accuracy of this opinion is where the debate should be — not whether Dr. K “likes” Romney, not whether he wrote speeches for Walter Mondale, not whether he's a neo-con, etc. etc.
So if anybody on this thread has solid evidence that Perry or some other candidate actually in the race would run better against Pres. Ø, then let's see it.