Since I'm wearing my flame retardant suit, I'll draw away some of the flame by agreeing with you. I'm as big a Sarah fan as the next person, but the Oval Office is a MAN's place. The most grave responsibility that the occupant of the Office is burdened with is the choice of who lives and who dies. Women of Sarah's ilk want everyone to live. There are circumstances that render that render that desire moot.
It's one thing to send uniformed military against another country's uniformed military in armed conflict. It's an altogether different thing to vaporize 2 million North Koreans or 100,000 Chinese babies in a strike on Beijing. Yet the thought that an American President will not hesitate to do so to protect America goes a long way toward giving the despots pause. My fear is that a woman will act according to her nature and seek resolutions that aren't possible to avoid doing the unthinkable when she should be launching ICBM's.
Having said that, If Sarah ends up being the nominee, I promise I'll be the first in line to vote for her and work for her victory.
Women tend to be more survival oriented than men. Men tend to avoid shooting another man in the back. A woman will not hesitate, they go for survival. Men will offer an even chance more often than not.
Sarah was chief of the Alaska National Guard...first in line against an attack on US across the North Pole from Russia, China, N Korea etc...