You have no proof and your link is a busted flush. More to the point: the Palins have already denied this story about Rice and all the other crazy allegations in McGinnis's book.
Stop pretending that your lies about Palin are OK because you don't believe that what you are (passive-aggressively) accusing her of is that bad. That is just sleazy equivocation on your part.
Lies are lies. For example: it's simply not OK to connect you with Barney Frank - not because 'it's not a big deal to have a gay liaison with a congressman' but because it's false.
Do you understand the difference?
It's not OK to support a lie about someone, just because you don't think the substance of your lie is that damning.
And could you tone down your apparently effortless Phariseeism a bit? I just ate.
As far as I am concerned, it probably did happen, but it does not concern me.
If Rice publicly denies it, I will gladly eat my words.:)
The question is, since you make such a big deal out of it, will you publicly eat yours if it’s proven true?