To: treetopsandroofs
we saw it coming but trust me on this one. There were posters on here who said they had no problem with overturning don't ask, others have said no problem with their sham marriage. What these idiots do not get is that this was not about homo's serving this is a bigger agenda, it is not just about marriage but the bigger agenda, a step in their agenda. Soon it will be they can fight and die but cannot marry in their state. Lower the age of consent for sex so these freaks can have sex with kids. It's about teaching all sorts of perverted sex in the schools, put it on the TV. http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
80 posted on
09/30/2011 6:51:47 AM PDT by
manc
(Hannity the fraud he admitted he's socially liberal he's no conservative marriage=1man+ 1 woman)
To: manc
we saw it coming but trust me on this one. There were posters on here who said they had no problem with overturning don't ask, others have said no problem with their sham marriage. What these idiots do not get is that this was not about homo's serving this is a bigger agenda, it is not just about marriage but the bigger agenda, a step in their agenda. Soon it will be they can fight and die but cannot marry in their state. Lower the age of consent for sex so these freaks can have sex with kids. It's about teaching all sorts of perverted sex in the schools, put it on the TV. http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
Same with marriage. If we cannot rely on 5000 years of tradition to defend it, then we cannot prevent polygamy, mothers marrying sons or fathers marrying daughters (since proper medical procedures can ensure no kids result), tens or hundreds of people marrying each other, etc. It's not a slippery slope, it's a gaping chasm.
82 posted on
09/30/2011 6:57:13 AM PDT by
DTxAg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson