Skip to comments.
Is This Man the G.O.P.’s Best Bet for 2012? (NYT's David Brooks pretty sold on Romney at this time)
New York Times ^
| 09/29/2011
| By DAVID BROOKS AND GAIL COLLINS
Posted on 09/29/2011 7:48:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Prokopton
No Rudy here...........but there is a Mitt.
Just because you effed-up the last national election gives you no reason or right to eff up the latest one.
If you want to be stupid, there’s an entire Crat Party to help you with that.
41
posted on
09/29/2011 9:13:28 PM PDT
by
JoenTX
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: Grunthor
This is about the least surprising development of this young election season.<<
Don't know about you....
But I'm shocked.......... and this is “unexpected"......
42
posted on
09/29/2011 9:18:41 PM PDT
by
M-cubed
To: SeekAndFind
Didn’t David Brooks write that John McCain was the GOP’s best bet in 2008?
To: grumpygresh
I know it’s hard...but hold your fire till we see the whites of “her” eyes....*W*
44
posted on
09/29/2011 9:23:38 PM PDT
by
M-cubed
To: JoenTX
Palin is not running. At all. Stop the fairy tales and return to what the rest of us call reality. <<
LMAO...after reading your past posts son...”reality” is the least of your concerns...professional help?..You Make the Call!
45
posted on
09/29/2011 9:38:48 PM PDT
by
M-cubed
To: SeekAndFind
Romney or Obama?
Why bother to vote!!!
If Romney is the GOP candidate they FAIL!
46
posted on
09/29/2011 9:42:23 PM PDT
by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: SeekAndFind
So Brooks and Frum are Romney-bots. Raise your hand if you're in the least bit surprised.
All the more reason why Romney must be utterly defeated, or barring that, marginalized by a muscular third party bid in the general election.
Nothing would destroy this country faster than having a liberal as the standard-bearer for the Republican party.
47
posted on
09/29/2011 9:45:14 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
To: Artemis Webb
Mitt Romney could beat Obama. If Mitt Romney is the nominee Ill vote for him. But a Mitt Romney presidency would set the conservative side of the GOP back farther than either Bush I or II.
I'll do you one better. A Romney presidency would mean the death of the GOP as a viable party for conservatives. It would force us to form a third party and perhaps be out in the wilderness for a generation.
In my opinion, it is more important that Romney be defeated than that Obama be defeated.
48
posted on
09/29/2011 9:47:43 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Take the pledge: I will not vote for Mitt Romney under any circumstances. EVER.)
To: JoenTX
Just because you effed-up the last national election gives you no reason or right to eff up the latest one. If you want to be stupid, theres an entire Crat Party to help you with that.
Wow, I didn't know I was personally responsible. I thought it was "effed up" by the weak, effete, Republican elite who wanted McCain and who now want Romney. You know, the type of Republican that thinks Crybaby Boehner is effective. I know there are Republicans like this, but what are you doing on FR, a conservative site?
To: Prokopton
“Only if enough of us work our butts off. “
Agree (and thanks, there are still tons of Perrybots to deal with out there).
50
posted on
09/30/2011 4:21:58 AM PDT
by
BobL
(PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson