[Yosemitest]

Are you telling me that "June 14, 1967 Congressional Record - House, pages 15975 through 15880" is a lie, and didn't happen?

Are you really tedlling me that ... on Page 15880 of the scrib.com site, the middle column, second paragraph, which says ...(quoted below) ...is a LIE?

To summarize;
a natural-born citizen of the United States, as that term is used in the Constitution of the United States,
means a citizen born within the territorial limits of the United States and subject to the laws of the United States at the time of such birth.
This does not Include children born within the territorial limits of the United States to alien parents who,
although present with the consent of the United States, enjoy diplomatic immunity from the laws of the United States,
and, as a consequence are not subject to the laws of the United States.
Nor would this include children born within the territorial limits of the United States to alien enemy parents in time of War
as a part of a hostile military force, and, as a consequence not present with the consent of the United States,
and not subject to the laws of the United States.
But, this does Include children born to alien parents who are present within the territorial limits of the United States
“In amity” t.e. with the consent of the United States, and subject to its laws at the time of birth.
U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark 169 US 649, Luria v. U.S., 231 US 9, Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162.

[patlin]

Are you telling me that “June 14, 1967 Congressional Record - House, pages 15975 through 15880” is a lie, and didn't happen?

Putting words in my mouth does not help your cause the same as citing propaganda from an OBOT website will not merit you any credibility as it has been proven to be taken out of context, i.e. the quote you prove, as nowhere IN ANY SCOTUS decision is a child born to aliens called “natural born”. This UNPUBLISHED essay states that WKA was deemed a natural born citizen, when in fact the opposite IS true, WKA was deemed “as much a citizen” (in the sense of rights) as the “natural born”. WKA claimed to be natural born, but the court refused to uphold that by stating fictitiously that according to statute, WKA was a citizen using English law instead of 100 years of settled US law to make the decision, the most current one at the time being a the courts decision written by Gray himself that upheld the 14th as meaning birth on soil alone constitutes citizenship & in that case he did cite 100 yrs of US law. The Elk case upheld the 14th as being constitutional in rejecting citizenship based purely on birth on US soil. Being president is not a right as the politically biased people claim, it is a privilege and right & privilege have never held the same meaning in any society.

[patlin]

correction as phone call interrupted my thought process:

citing propaganda from an OBOT website will not merit you any credibility as it has been proven to be taken out of context (i.e. the quote you give) as nowhere IN ANY SCOTUS decision is a child born to aliens called “natural born”. This UNPUBLISHED essay states that WKA was deemed a natural born citizen. In fact the opposite IS true, WKA was deemed “as much a citizen” (in the sense of rights) as the “natural born”. WKA claimed to be natural born, but the court refused to uphold that by stating fictitiously that according to statute, WKA was a citizen using English law instead of 100 years of settled US law to make the decision. The most current SCOTUS decision at the time was written by Gray himself and that decision upheld the US Govt policy of the 14th denying birth on soil alone as an avenue to citizenship & in that case Gray did cite 100 yrs of US law never touching English law. The Elk case upheld the 14th as being constitutional in rejecting citizenship based purely on birth on US soil. Being president is not a right as the politically biased people claim, it is a privilege and right & privilege have never held the same meaning in any society. But when the legitimacy of a judges appointment comes into question as did Gray's, politics breeds corruption & thus the raping of 14th Amendment citizenship since 1898.