[iontheball]

No, you fail to understand how the Supreme Court works. Just because Congress has the authority to make laws does not mean that all such laws are Constitutional. If the Act you refer to is challenged in the Supreme Court, the Court will judge the law against Article II. It may or may not pass the test.

[Yosemitest]

If it chooses,

Congress and the states can ratify a constitutional amendment that eradicates the decision and/or protects an entity from future action, form the Supreme Court.

While the President and Congress can't directly change an unfavorable decision, they may circumvent the decision by passing legislation that addresses the constitutional challenge while still accomplishing their goal. Congress also has the right to prevent the Supreme Court from hearing certain types of cases under their appellate jurisdiction (called jurisdiction stripping) to reduce the possibility of certain controversies being declared unconstitutional in the future. Neither of these actions would overturn or change the Court's decision; they are simply political maneuvers used to check the federal judiciary.

,/a>What part of March 26, 1790 don't you understand?
Do you think today's Supreme Court is going to undo a LAW that was written by the Founding Fathers?
You jump the gun, too quickly. Slow down and read the post.
Don't just respond through emotion. That's what liberals do.