Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeDude

I would be shocked if any of the pubs running or potentially running would undo any of it, happy but shocked. They won’t advance the agenda, but I seriously doubt they will roll any of it back. Maybe 20 years ago they would do so, but most of it wasn’t even an issue 20 years ago, it wouldn’t have happened in the first place.

Freegards


11 posted on 09/30/2011 9:08:21 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed
minimally, I would like to see strict rules on behavior while on duty or on the bases...

we used to go to open dances at the AFB when I was in school....are they now going to have to sponser gay dances?.....OMG....

but you know what is really telling?....that the high military establishment is rushing along supporting this...it tells me that they are charater less,amoral,goose stepping statist who do anything for a promotion...

and these people are supposed to protest the people from tyranny?....don't think so...

14 posted on 09/30/2011 9:29:58 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed
minimally, I would like to see strict rules on behavior while on duty or on the bases...

we used to go to open dances at the AFB when I was in school....are they now going to have to sponser gay dances?.....OMG....

but you know what is really telling?....that the high military establishment is rushing along supporting this...it tells me that they are charater less,amoral,goose stepping statist who do anything for a promotion...

and these people are supposed to protest the people from tyranny?....don't think so...

15 posted on 09/30/2011 9:30:45 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed

Rollback will be a tall order.

We never should have let obama in in the first place.

I have no doubt whatsoever that a McCain/Palin administration would not have turned the military into a homosexual indoctrination center.

Yet, back then, there were plenty (too many) who said that there was no difference between the candidates.

Likewise, when the GOP nominates Romney, there will be many who will say that he is no different from obama.

The point being: we cannot take the chance of what further damage obama can do to the country by re-electing him. Romney (whom I do not support, incidentally, and would never do so until a general election) may not undo everything obama has done, but at least he will not cause the same type of damage that obama will cause if re-elected.

Again, in retrospect, I think we see clearly that this is the case.

Choosing McCain back in 2008 over obama was not “the lesser of two evils”.

It was choosing someone who is basically a liberal, but clearly someone who is identifiable with an existing American tradition, as opposed to choosing someone who is (most likely) Marxist, Muslum, and gay himself, and who clearly despises America, capitalism and everything that is good and true to the core.


18 posted on 09/30/2011 11:28:15 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson