He has never held office, so of course, he is not responsible for any legislation or government activity. Cain has simply not been tested and we have no idea how he will actually govern, all we have is speculation based on his business record and his speeches.
Perry and Romney (RINOs) make bad judgments.
IT IS PROVEN by their own history and faux pas.
Mr. Cain talks conservative, unlike the two RINOs.
Plan to save America: NO RINOs. NO MORE RINOs.
Isn’t that the truth...he has less experience than Mittens...why put someone in as President as was done with the disaster in chief living in our WH and trust he’d know what to do. Perry has 11 years of governoring a state larger than most countries and is now the 13th largest economy in the world. Perry has a proven record on the economy and jobs. People have become brainless since they are either not being honest or are that brainless.
When considering a candidate, political experience (ability to compromise, exchange political favors, speak out of both sides of your mouth, and placate lobbyists) is not high on my list. Nor do I consider the ability to name the Prime Minister of Kyrgyzstan key to governing. All presidents have encountered situations that did not come up in party platforms or were asked about in debates. I want to know if they will be able to handle that situation in a manner I would consider successful. To me, the factors I look at are whether the person has executive experience and a track record of success in leadership positions; and, the core set of values. I like Governors because they have executive experience but would not rule out a person with business executive experience. In fact, given the current economic conditions which, I believe, are a direct result of excessive government (both spending and meddling in the free market) I would rather have a person who knows business and has created private sector jobs than a career politician who has risen through the political ranks to a Governor's position.
I thought Obama had minimal experience, which was legislative, so no real leadership skills. I thought his personal ideology was to hate common American people and trust the government and the elite who believed like him. When decisions needed to be made that had not been identified during the campaign, I believed he would make the wrong call every time. The only decision he has made that surprised me was the call to take Osama out. I think that one actually went against his instincts but was made for his own political favor. Otherwise, he has acted just as expected.
I believe Cain's core values are pro-America, pro-capitalism and socially conservative. When he gets the 3 AM I would trust him to make the right decision and have the ability to implement it.
For some only Red Meat Rhetoric is what counts, actions and experience not so much.