Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup: GOP has double-digit lead on nat’l security, prosperity over Dems
Hotair ^ | 09/30/2011 | ED MORRISSEY

Posted on 09/30/2011 1:35:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

We’ve seen plenty of polling that shows voter disenchantment with both parties. That doesn’t make the disenchantment evenly distributed, however, as Gallup discovers in its latest poll:

Americans see the Republican Party as better able than the Democratic Party to protect the country from terrorism and military threats, and to keep the country prosperous over the next few years.

These views come as record numbers of Americans are dissatisfied with the way the nation is being governed and express highly negative opinions about a number of other dimensions of the federal government. Next year’s elections provide Americans with an opportunity to vent their frustrations in the presidential and the congressional elections. At this point, Republicans, who currently control the House but not the presidency or the Senate, appear to be at least slightly better positioned going into the elections, given Americans’ preference for the GOP to handle the nation’s domestic and international woes.

Democrats held the advantage over the Republican Party on the “prosperous” dimension from 2003 through 2009, a period that included the majority of George W. Bush’s presidency and the first year of Barack Obama’s. The advantage switched to the GOP last year and remains so this year, by 48% to 39%.

Republicans have a long trend line of advantage on national security, so that’s not exactly a surprise. Democrats briefly held the lead in late 2007 as the war in Iraq worsened and George W. Bush launched the “surge” strategy that eventually succeeded in pacifying the violence.

Prosperity is another matter. With the single exception of a tie in late 2002, voters have generally trusted Democrats to protect prosperity over Republicans as late as the third quarter of 2009, at that time by 50/39. By the time of the 2010 midterms, that had flipped by 19 points in the gap to a 48/40 advantage for the GOP. And it’s telling that a year later, after nine months of Republican control of the House, that margin has only changed slightly — and in the direction of Republicans, 48/39.

Similarly, Democrats have surrendered an edge on handling the nation’s “most important problem,” according to voters. Republicans historically trailed in this measure even through the 2004 election, in which they won the presidency and picked up seats in the House and Senate. In late 2009, Democrats led this measure 45/34, and even in the 2010 midterms held onto a statistical tie at 38/40. Republicans now lead 44/37.

Still, it’s not all celebration for Republicans, either. Support for a third party remains relatively high at 55/38 after a 47/47 tie in 2008. As Republicans get ready to take the Senate and argue for a Republican President, voters don’t seem terribly interested in single-party control of Washington, although they are mainly diffident about the prospect — 28% like the idea, 29% don’t, and 39% say it won’t make a difference either way. It’s a portrait of dissatisfaction, but Democrats are still bearing the brunt of it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; gallup; gop; nationalsecurity

1 posted on 09/30/2011 1:35:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is stunning. The capture of OBL had absolutely no impact on the dems standing on national security.


2 posted on 09/30/2011 1:37:05 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Still, it’s not all celebration for Republicans, either. Support for a third party remains relatively high

The media whores and pimps can't contain themselves, when they see the pubbies getting ahead in the polls, they start pimping the "third party = TEA party" bullshit.

The only guy that concerns me in the least is that billionaire guy with an orange squirrel on his head, and an ego bigger than Rhode Island.

I've met "The Donald" and he is even a bigger ego maniac in real life than he portrays on TV.

The man is very rich, has street smarts, and really believes that when he, not Hugo Chavez, gets up, then the sun comes up.

3 posted on 09/30/2011 1:47:51 PM PDT by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
This is stunning. The capture of OBL had absolutely no impact on the dems standing on national security.

Or maybe it did, given who deserves much of the credit for implementing the policies that got Bin Laden.

10 Reasons Why the Death of Bin Laden Won't Help Obama In the Long Run

Ex-CIA Counterterror Chief: ‘Enhanced Interrogation’ Led U.S. to bin Laden

4 posted on 09/30/2011 2:23:23 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson