Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Very cool if they can pull it off. The video is great: SpaceX
1 posted on 10/02/2011 8:07:04 AM PDT by Dagnabitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dagnabitt

2 posted on 10/02/2011 8:10:36 AM PDT by Dagnabitt (Kennedy, McCain, Perry...what's with D students and support for Amnesty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dagnabitt

Can’t say much for the music.
Where is all the fuel to come from?


3 posted on 10/02/2011 8:15:37 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dagnabitt

Nice concept - but really can we colonize the moon or something like that rather than build tubes that circle the earth.

I least there may be a payout with minerals etc.


5 posted on 10/02/2011 8:33:10 AM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dagnabitt

Nice concept - but really can we colonize the moon or something like that rather than build tubes that circle the earth.

I least there may be a payout with minerals etc.


6 posted on 10/02/2011 8:33:20 AM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dagnabitt; tet68; mike_9958; Loud Mime

I saw the video too, Musk said the first stage doesn’t need wings to make a controlled re-entry. All the older designs envisioned a winged flyback booster with a crew. But it just doesn’t seem realistic. The first stage booster would have to be so much heavier. And how much heat would it have to take on re-entry? And the fuel necessary to make a controlled return vis a vis the amount necessary to launch the payload?

Musk says it works on paper but I help but think I’m looking at the Sanger antipodal bomber.


8 posted on 10/02/2011 8:51:42 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dagnabitt

Here’s another SpaceX video along the same lines.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p6EruPdoXY


9 posted on 10/02/2011 9:13:50 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dagnabitt

I see all that obsession with a vertical landing, from various companies (Space X, Blue Origin, and Armadillo). Is that the holy grail? Just seems so much easier to stuff the damn things with parachutes, and then retrieve the things from the ocean. Refuel/reuse. I admit I have not looked into the whole flight envelopes proposed, so maybe I am just not seeing things correctly...


19 posted on 10/02/2011 1:44:09 PM PDT by Paradox (Democrats on Obama, They can't deny him, He is them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson