A few of the problems are as follows:
1. The Executive branch carries out the laws and court orders - it is not the office of an elected king or tyrant.
2. Given the ease with which Executive branches all over America, from the Presidency to the local “Drug Warrior Forced Entry Teams”, manage to find compliant judges to issue warrants or “findings of law”, it is impossible that this “Regime” couldn't have gotten legal justification from a court.
3. Since no court was asked, it becomes both clear and unambiguous that the “Regime” wants to establish the president for what amount to executive executions.
I am all for killing Moslim terrorists, but to avoid having anyone the “Regime” doesn't like being dubbed a terrorists and summarily executed, what happened with
this case should cause America to demand open and transparent laws be passed.
no doubt that the 'precedent' of the resident can and will be used against us in the future...
but really, weve all known for a looooong time that the POTUS or any other uber ranking politician can and does participate in thinning the herd whenever it wants...see waco and ruby ridge for a couple examples of this that were fortunate enuff to make natl nooooze...
we're all just a reichstag from the coupling of cattle cars...'for the children' of course...