Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Are Anarchists and Revolutionaries,"This Is the Beginning of a Revolution in This Country"
The Blaze ^ | October 3rd | Naked Emperor News

Posted on 10/04/2011 6:59:26 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

(VIDEO) "This Is Revolution Not Reform" - Occupy Wall Street Organizer to 'Excited' Al Sharpton: We Are Anarchists and Revolutionaries,"This Is the Beginning of a Revolution in This Country"


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anarchists; corruption; crushliberalism; cwii; democrats; gunfreezone; killcommunism; liberalfascism; liberals; liberalviolence; marxism; obama; obamasminions; ows; progressives; revolution; revolutionaries; sharpton; soros; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Do these idiots calling themselves anarchists even know what that word means? If their “revolution” succeeds we would have a society without laws or government. IOW, anything goes. These cupcakes wouldn’t last a week.


61 posted on 10/04/2011 7:45:54 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

I wish these pus*ies would just bring it so we could get on the real revolution. We are loooooooong overdue.


62 posted on 10/04/2011 7:46:03 AM PDT by max americana (FUBO NATION 2012 FK BARAK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
We HAD our revolution way back. NOW we have representative government. It is the model of fair and efficient government that countries world wide strive to attain. Failing in that, they demonstrate. It's all they CAN do.

Why should we, in a country with free and fair elections conducted on a regular basis, need to descend to civil discord and anarchy?

I'll tell you why. A lot of lazy, spoiled and ill-educated losers want a life they REFUSE to work and struggle for. THAT'S why!!

63 posted on 10/04/2011 7:46:15 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny. " Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

This is not done by anonymous. on 4chan, they are having none of this.

This is SEIU, ACORN, Soros.

These are the people who protested LePage in Maine for taking down a pro-labor mural. The people who were protesting in Wisconsin.

However, I don’t think they really know what they’re doing.
Is a sign saying “No More Banker Bailouts Obama” appropriate for this occupy? Why not? They don’t know. Throw in other things that the Left doesn’t like and it’ll look like the Left is protesting against Obama. Stop Monstanto Obama. No More Poison Food.


64 posted on 10/04/2011 7:46:40 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Can I copy and paste that to Facebook?


65 posted on 10/04/2011 7:47:18 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Those people are tools


66 posted on 10/04/2011 7:49:46 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

67 posted on 10/04/2011 7:55:03 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Sure. Just correct the spelling first. (”e” in “someone”)


68 posted on 10/04/2011 7:56:09 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

*face palm*

oops.

heh. Thank goodness I attributed it to sphinx on my FB! Not that anyone who sees it will know what or who sphinx is I guess.


69 posted on 10/04/2011 8:03:27 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Beck is saying “get into the life boat”, the time is now. Anyone know what he is talking about?


70 posted on 10/04/2011 8:04:37 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

It is bitter irony that the biggest communists are people who have achieved their power by exploiting capitalism. So then they have inner conflict. No man can serve two masters. Do they want communism, or do they want money?

I think it was Yuri Bezmenov who basically said that the ultimate goal of communism is to achieve limitless power and wealth for the controllers. When communism is actually achieved there are still resources; it’s just that the resources are in the power of a few elite people, and everybody else is basically slave labor to serve the masters.

So if Soros and Goldman have both sold their souls to be among the ruling elite in a communist world government, there is no conflict of interest. Goldman wouldn’t have to care about investors if he truly believed that capitalism would fall and communism instituted - as long as HE was one of those few elites who would then literally own and control the masses (including those who were previously stock-holders).

We’ll see what happens. But it seems to me that most of the big banking and economy people have seen the writing on the wall and aligned themselves with both communism and Islamism. The bailouts went primarily to foreign banks who had contributed to ACORN and the democrat party and who are shariah-compliant. IOW, they have invested in communism and Islamism ahead of the communist-Islamist takeover. And they’ve been rewarded, and continue to be rewarded by the very douches these moronic communists/anarchists think are going to save them from the greedy capitalist machine.


71 posted on 10/04/2011 8:05:29 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Why don’t these people move to Greece - that is where the majority of their wishes are current law. Of course there the vultures are just feet away and there is no water anywhere.


72 posted on 10/04/2011 8:09:03 AM PDT by SES1066 (1776 to 2011, 235 years and counting in the GRAND EXPERIMENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

He thinks the economy is about to crash and lots of civil unrest. He’s said this for months.


73 posted on 10/04/2011 8:09:20 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Oh Ok, I thought it might have been because of the marxists protests going on accross the country. Yeah I have been doing all I can to get ready for an economic depression. But mother nature is NOT cooperating my garden here in Texas needs rain badly.


74 posted on 10/04/2011 8:14:26 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
I do understand that these “protests” are driven by hard core Leftists who would shoot their own mother with a dry eye. However...these crowds are 90% young fools or old hippies from what I've seen. The people behind this crap are not laying on the sidewalk for weeks at a time.
The “anarchist” types come out for the riots to break stuff.

JMHO. I take this stuff very seriously. The hard Left scare me. I understand how they work.

Sean Hannity had a silly 20 year old on his radio program...saying she had a full ride scholarship to medical school, that would be lost if she was arrested. The idiocy that came out of this kids mouth was jaw dropping. I sincerely don't think ANYBODY gave her a scholarship to anything other than Podunk CC, however, I think a lot of the crowd is made up of dopes like this...and old hippies on SSI refiling their glory days. They are being used.

75 posted on 10/04/2011 8:23:17 AM PDT by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Their little protest officially jumped the shark when they decided to dress like zombies.

lol...who came up with that idea? And what exactly is its intended effect? Middle management guy looks down at the street, sees these idiots dressed as and impersonating zombies and thinks to himself, "You know...they're right. I need to stop being a corporate zombie!"

76 posted on 10/04/2011 8:29:07 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Well, when you put it like that......it does make sense. It’s always bothered me that Islam has had every door opened for it. I always attributed it to oil. I knew Islam put their boy in office and gave him a Muslim Brotherhood support staff. I’m just not 100% convinced Goldman Sachs would give up their kingdom that easily.


77 posted on 10/04/2011 8:38:42 AM PDT by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Glenn just mentioned some threat of an “attack” on WS next week.

Up till now this thing has been some combination of comic opera, SNL skit and hippie nostalgia. But the Left cannot afford to be laughed at over what they regard as a crucial issue. Look for union muscle to start showing up on Wall Street next week and for some real serious trouble to ensue.
78 posted on 10/04/2011 8:44:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

‘just took an inventory...’ While I don’t lose sleep over these ‘revolutionaries’ or their urban thug counterparts stirring up serious trouble in central Virginia, I did just order several new magazines for my mini-14...just an old Boy Scout ‘be prepared’ thing.


79 posted on 10/04/2011 8:48:12 AM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

I wonder if Goldman Sachs was involved in any way with the run on the bank in Sept of 2008. Somebody (or a combination of somebodies) had enough money to do enough serious damage that President Bush stood before the nation and told us that the capitalist free world would be destroyed if we didn’t pass the bailout. That was about a week after the run on the bank and the markets had not totally crashed (nor would they crash the whole time that TARP was being debated) but somebody apparently convinced Bush that they had the power to end capitalism for good if they so desired, in retaliation for TARP not being passed. No little fish would have the power to convince Bush of that.IMHO, there had to be somebody HUGE holding the gun to Bush’s head at that point. Was Goldman part of that? I’d really like to know...

I’m pretty clueless on finance and economy so I don’t know exactly how it would work, but to get these filthy-rich people to support the destruction of the free world economy that has given them all the luxury in the world, somebody has to be telling them that they will be the king when this system goes down and will inherit an even richer position of power and wealth.


80 posted on 10/04/2011 9:04:57 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson