“Foreign policy platform” is pretty vague. Anything in particular you would like to know?
This is a good interview for Herman Cain and it starts with him being asked about the Perry controversy. He plays off comments that he made yesterday by saying that he was only referring to the word on the rock as insensitive, not Perry, and that he has since learned that Perry’s family painted over the word and that he doesn’t feel that the word reflects negatively in any way on Governor Perry.
http://www.therightscoop.com/herman-cain-backs-down-from-perry-rock-story/
Are you so racially sensitive that you find the word “vanilla” to be racially-charged?
After the media reports came out Sunday AM, Herman Cain went on two major political shows and played the race card. Cain acted no better then Jackson, Rangel, Waters or Reverand Al. Damage done! The feeding frenzy continues.
Thought better of Herman. Guess I was wrong.
Why did Cain bring up the issue of a word painted on a rock that had already been painted out? It was a low blow and indicated a mean streak in the man.
What did it have to do with being POTUS?
I’m sorry but I am looking for a candidate who is not mired in pettiness and who has the big picture. Cain has absolutely no experience in governance, no credentials for becoming President and does not concern himself with the weighty issues that confront a President.
Foreign policy is of little concern on today’s FR. It used to be the biggest concern.
I think it would be smart to know the whole story before you comment on it. He was way too quick to yank that race card not knowing the whole situation.