Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CedarDave

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-157

No Republicans supported Reid’s use of the ‘nuclear option’.


167 posted on 10/06/2011 6:41:20 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
No Republicans supported Reid’s use of the ‘nuclear option’.

The Republicans couldn't do anything about it, because Reid used a parliamentary procedure to unilaterally change the rule.

The next chance for Republicans to express displeasure at this was the vote on the bill, and that's where the 12 Republicans broke with the caucus and voted for the bill anyway.

The comment from Levin was that Obama was going to veto the bill anyway, so voting for it instead of showing solidarity was pointless.

-PJ

193 posted on 10/06/2011 7:36:02 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Everyone's Irish on St. Patrick's Day, Mexican on Cinco de Mayo, and American on Election Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith; little jeremiah
No Republicans supported Reid’s use of the ‘nuclear option’.

Apparently there were two votes one of which was the "nuclear" option. DeMint said they needed to remain united for both votes. I'm not sure I understand but you can listen to Mark and DeMint talking about it here:

10/06 The Mark Levin Show
(download and scroll right to a little over half-way to listen to them discussing both votes)

Reid triggers ‘nuclear option’ to change Senate rules, end repeat filibusters

246 posted on 10/07/2011 1:47:18 PM PDT by CedarDave (Sarah's out; need a new tagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson