Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy eyes dozen new stealth destroyers (Russia)
Russia Today ^ | 10 October, 2011

Posted on 10/10/2011 8:15:24 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Navy eyes dozen new stealth destroyers

Published: 10 October, 2011, 14:16

The Russian Navy is to deploy 14 to 16 new destroyer-class multipurpose warships over the next two decades. The desired vessel will be a natural naval killer of all sorts of targets from submarines to enemy missiles.

Production of the first ship of the new series may begin as early as in 2012, a source in the defense industry told Izvestia newspaper. The military want a versatile tool capable to engage surface fleets, submarines and aerial targets, including missiles.

“It will be a universal warship, which will be able to replace three classes of vessels. Thanks to modern weapons it will surpass the Large ASW destroyers in anti-submarine warfare and modern surface combat destroyers and guided-missile ships in terms of surface firepower and air defense capabilities, with the exception of the [nuclear-powered battlecruiser] Peter the Great and other ships of that class,” the source said.

Key to such versatility will be rocket launch systems, which will be able to fire different types of missiles depending on the task. The destroyers will carry anti-ship guided missiles, anti-submarine rocket-propelled torpedoes, surface-to-surface cruise missiles and medium-to-long-range surface-to-air missiles. It will also have two to four twin artillery guns.

“At the moment different versions of the warship are being evaluated and the propulsion system is being chosen. Depending on the Navy’s needs and budget restrictions they will have nuclear or gas turbine propulsion,” the source added.

Earlier media reports said the new vessel, which has been in development since at least 2009, will have displacement of 9-10,000 tonnes or 12-14,000 tonnes, depending on the choice of propulsion system. It will carry two or three combat helicopters. Its hull will use stealth technology to lower the ships radar cross-section.

The destroyer will be equipped with modern tactical information and weapons control system similar in capabilities to the American AEGIS.

With deployment of new ships, the navy will have additional flexibility in forming small yet powerful naval task forces consisting of one destroyer and tree to four escorts, the military say. The new ships will partially replace older destroyers and will partially strengthen the Russian fleets.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: destroyer; navy; russia; stealth

Early concept for a large destroyer

1 posted on 10/10/2011 8:15:29 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They got the Shkval-2 working?


2 posted on 10/10/2011 8:27:56 AM PDT by null and void (Day 992 of America's holiday from reality...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

hmmmmmm ... Your take on this:

“The destroyer will be equipped with modern tactical information and weapons control system similar in capabilities to the American AEGIS. “


3 posted on 10/10/2011 8:28:08 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Not impossible, but then the AEGIS system has been around for a few decades now!!


4 posted on 10/10/2011 8:30:58 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Beautiful ship!

But why gas turbines instead of nuclear power? Wouldn't a nuke plant lessen their dependence upon refueling at sea from other vessels and greatly extend their range?

5 posted on 10/10/2011 8:33:26 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Team Obama will not shrink from violence to remain in power. Be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Most ships called “destroyers” today are really cruisers... It seems that its easier to get allocations for “destroyers” than it is for “cruisers.”


6 posted on 10/10/2011 8:41:44 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The next world war will be a war lasting 1 hour. And if we are cutting our military America will be a sand pile. Wake up America! Face reality with the communists wreaking America, we are very venerable.


7 posted on 10/10/2011 8:43:50 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Hmmm? it’s been going on for over a decade by my count.


8 posted on 10/10/2011 9:10:21 AM PDT by null and void (Day 992 of America's holiday from reality...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Russian Naval power or Russian sales power? Is it for them or really for export? I wonder. No nuke power? I guess some oil rich countries might show an interest in purchasing a few.


9 posted on 10/10/2011 10:08:40 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (CAIN, CAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; sukhoi-30mki

It would seem so with an angle rate of up to 20 degrees at speeds up to 300 knots. IIRC the big problem with the early Shkvals was they were really only good in a straight line, but this one seems able to move about.


10 posted on 10/11/2011 1:18:44 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson