To: DRey
If money was the main reason for winning, we should have had president Nelson Rockefeller, Governor Meg Whitman, on and on...I got a list of 20 candidates with overwhelming money advantage who lost.
47 posted on
10/11/2011 11:12:24 AM PDT by
federal__reserve
(November 2012 will decide whether we fall into an abyss or walk up the shiny city on the hill.)
To: federal__reserve
What you do NOT have is a list of 20 candidates with overwhelming money disadvantage, like Cain, who won. And that is the material point.
49 posted on
10/11/2011 11:15:22 AM PDT by
DRey
(Perry/Rubio 2012)
To: federal__reserve
” If money was the main reason for winning, we.... “
Fools are born in but a moment. Perry has to mount a comeback and carpet bomb the entire field, expose them and let the chips fall where they may. Cain is supporting a socialist, Romney. It is crystal clear. Why would that be okay with FReepers? Cain is a facilitator for Romney and is smart enough to know how this is going down. Cain is telegraphing it. You also are a serving utilitarian to the end game. Socialism. Cain/Romney should be very thankful.
51 posted on
10/11/2011 11:18:50 AM PDT by
RitaOK
(TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick, who needs to pound the fiction flackers back into the Stone Age.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson