Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

If there’s anything in the Constitution or in the record of the debates at the Constitutional Convention that in any way suggests that apportioning electors from a State in proportion to that State’s popular vote, or in proportion to the number of Congressional districts where each candidate won the popular vote in the district, I have been unable to find it.

In fact, it seems quite clear that the Framers intened to give the legislature of each State full and non-reviewable power to select Presidential electors in any manner they see fit.


24 posted on 10/11/2011 7:00:05 PM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery
At the time of adoption the British Parliament continued to grant special seats to MPs from Oxford and Cambridge.

They also had the "Rotten Borough" system, and bribery was common.

Still, Britain's Parliament had set an example of allowing the broadest of representative structures.

That's just one of the reasons the Founders left it to the states to decide the who's and what's.

28 posted on 10/11/2011 7:12:30 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson