Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aqua225

LS has been very devious about this. They bought a company that owned satellite frequencies close to GPS and in a band intended for satellite transmission only . The satellite signals were not strong enough to use with th eLS ground recievers so LS asked for a wavier to “agument” the satellite signals with ground based repeaters/transmitters. The problem is having those ground based transmitters blasting high powered signals in a frequency area used by ground based receivers designed for satellite signals, NOT high powered ground based signals. It’s not a simple matter of filtering, it would be like listening to a wisper (GPS) in one ear when someone’s (LS ground based repeaters) screaming in the other.

The FCC should not have granted LS the waiver to operate high powered ground based repeaters in a frequency range that’s always been used for satellite transmissions.


8 posted on 10/12/2011 3:48:46 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

Thanks. That’s what I’d read but couldn’t remember it.


11 posted on 10/12/2011 3:51:58 PM PDT by jazusamo (The real minimum wage is zero: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman
Yup.

And for those that don't know, it was the MILITARY that brought the world GPS.

The GPS project was developed in 1973 to overcome the limitations of previous navigation systems,[1] integrating ideas from several predecessors, including a number of classified engineering design studies from the 1960s. GPS was created and realized by the U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD) and was originally run with 24 satellites. It became fully operational in 1994."

Clinton was the first Rat with his snout in the cheese - he gave away the military control on GPS accuracy, and later, frequency control.

It was a payoff to donors who wanted to piggy back on what the DoD funded and implemented.

17 posted on 10/12/2011 4:13:47 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman

Thanks for the summary, I think you explained what is going on here better than most of these “he said/she said” news stories.

The question I would like answered is: Did the Obama administration sell these frequencies to their cronies simply because they didn’t foresee the consequences? Or, were the consequences intended because they align with Obama’s goal of weakening America?

The results may be indistinguishable regardless of whether the cause was corruption, negligence, incompetence, or something more seditious, but that is, I think, the real issue we need to be focusing on: establishing the motives.


23 posted on 10/12/2011 4:26:14 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson