Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cain Joins Nevada Caucus Boycott
WMUR ^ | 10.14.11 | staff

Posted on 10/14/2011 12:50:47 PM PDT by casablanca

MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain has joined other candidates in boycotting the Nevada caucus unless the state moves its caucus date back to appease New Hampshire.

Cain's New Hampshire campaign co-chair Jack Kimball confirmed the decision Friday.

"Mr. Cain believes Nevada is making a bad problem worse, exacerbating a situation started by Florida moving it's primary into January," Kimball said.

Read more: http://www.wmur.com/new-hampshire-primary-extended-coverage/29487020/detail.html#ixzz1amrmWsD2

(Excerpt) Read more at wmur.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hermancain; myth; nevada; nevadastinks
Romney's Nevada shenanigans is backfiring.
1 posted on 10/14/2011 12:50:56 PM PDT by casablanca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: casablanca

This is a mistake.


2 posted on 10/14/2011 12:52:58 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: casablanca

Either way, I’ll be caucusing for Cain.


3 posted on 10/14/2011 12:54:29 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Not by Cain. He’s joining almost all the others in the boycott. Romney’s people are pushing the date up for his advantage. Time to put the foot down. Pretty soon, we’ll be voting in primaries 2 years before the election if this crap keeps up


4 posted on 10/14/2011 12:55:34 PM PDT by casablanca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: casablanca

Lame. States can caucus or have a primary when they please. If Cain doesn’t like it, don’t compete in it.


5 posted on 10/14/2011 12:58:57 PM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: casablanca

Nevada caucus..sold to the highest bidder..fully rigged


6 posted on 10/14/2011 1:00:13 PM PDT by Fred (But we are never going to survive unless we get a little crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: casablanca

The way it is done now is BS by allowing a handful of states to be the ones who pick our candidate. I say we have a national primary day and let the chips fall where they may.


7 posted on 10/14/2011 1:14:56 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: casablanca

The way it is done now is BS by allowing a handful of states to be the ones who pick our candidate. I say we have a national primary day and let the chips fall where they may.


8 posted on 10/14/2011 1:15:04 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

You are correct, it is totally rigged. I have been involved with the Nevada caucus for over 12 years.


9 posted on 10/14/2011 1:16:07 PM PDT by adaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: casablanca

I quit the Republican Party last election here in Nevada when the powers that be inside it stabbed Angle in the back and gave their support to Harry Reid.

Now they are backing Romney. Suprise suprise suprise.


10 posted on 10/14/2011 1:17:33 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (http://www.durban3nyc.com/. Go there and learn what those who seek to destroy Israel are up to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

God Bless you.


11 posted on 10/14/2011 1:22:07 PM PDT by ZULU (ANYBODY BUT ROMNEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“I say we have a national primary day and let the chips fall where they may.”

I like that idea! Drop it in the GOP suggestion box—I’m sure they care.


12 posted on 10/14/2011 1:24:25 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

Completely pathetic, wasn’t it? Sheesh.


13 posted on 10/14/2011 1:24:51 PM PDT by adaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

[ I say we have a national primary day and let the chips fall where they may. ]

DAMN RIGHT!

Then after that day we have another primary day of the candidates taht are left over and they get picked as the Vice President Nominee.

We need to do this all at once to prevent the “sheep effect” that state primaries encourage. And make all primaries closed primaries as well.

We need to tout this as a true “The people of rht GOp Pick” and expose the hypocrisy of the whole “DNC Super-duper-lloper delegate” system.


14 posted on 10/14/2011 1:26:01 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: magritte
Lame. States can caucus or have a primary when they please. If Cain doesn’t like it, don’t compete in it.

The state organizations are part of a national organization. If they violate the rules of the national organization, then members who respect the national organization are correct in refusing patronage to the violating entity.

15 posted on 10/14/2011 1:33:24 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

You don’t think that the national organization is going to ignore the Nevada Caucus results, do you?


16 posted on 10/14/2011 1:36:37 PM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: casablanca
Romney's Nevada shenanigans is backfiring.

Romney's Florida shenanigans are backfiring also.

17 posted on 10/14/2011 1:51:23 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magritte
I think there are punishments for such action. IIRC, in 2008 FL lost half its delegation in Republican Convention, and lost all in Democrat Convention. Hillary won the primaries there.
18 posted on 10/14/2011 1:52:08 PM PDT by paudio (0bama is like a bad mechanic who couldn't fix your car; he just makes it worse. Get somebody else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: paudio

We’ll have to see ... this is a Romney year and I find it doubtful Nevada, a Romney state, will be penalized.


19 posted on 10/14/2011 1:56:05 PM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: adaven

You are correct, it is totally rigged. I have been involved with the Nevada caucus for over 12 years.


Clearly. Last time (I was a Fred-Head) was my first, and I was appalled. I’ll probably post a vanity as the caucus approaches with more details, and seeking advice on how to handle it.

The leadership at the caucus (small town, conservative county) had no clue, or pretended to. The delegates were selected by volunteering. Basically who jumped up first. There as NO correlation between the caucuses’ candidate preferences and who was selected. (Ron Paul’s people jumped up fast).

I later contacted the party, squawked, and was told I could attend the next level convention as a delegate (again, not having been selected by my fellow citizens).

This time, I’m going to stand up, be a PITA, and ask “Who’s in charge? How many delegates does this caucus elect? How are those delegates selected?” And I will vocally persist in an attempt to reach some kind of fairness and take it out of the hands of the party insiders.


20 posted on 10/14/2011 1:57:47 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Author of BullionBible.com - Makes You a Precious Metal Expert, Guaranteed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: magritte
Lame. States can caucus or have a primary when they please. If Cain doesn’t like it, don’t compete in it

Sounds like that's what Cain did. Since that is what you said he should do, why is it lame?

21 posted on 10/14/2011 2:25:03 PM PDT by farmguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; freeangel; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; campaignPete R-CT; ...
I say we have a national primary day and let the chips fall where they may.

I wouldn't mind it. Put it in May and maybe you could stop the campaign season from starting so early. It's really the only way to give everyone an equal say. I'd try it with an instant-runoff ballot so nobody wins without a majority vote, this would shelve the role of the delegates in picking the nominee. Or you could award delegates proportionality and then let them battle it out at the convention, fun.

People can give you good reasons why it's a bad idea though.

22 posted on 10/14/2011 2:36:02 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

>The way it is done now is BS by allowing a handful of states to be the ones who pick our candidate. I say we have a national primary day and let the chips fall where they may.<

It’ll never happen. We’re stuck letting a few states choose the candidate for the rest of us.

I wonder what the Founding Fathers would say about this incredibly biased method?


23 posted on 10/14/2011 2:39:31 PM PDT by Darnright ("I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy

If all of the primaries were on the same day, I hope that we wouldn’t have an instant runoff. Several candidates would win primaries, and no one would win a majority of the delegates. The convention would be more suspenseful and exciting, causing more people to watch and hear the great republican ideas. When the 1980 Republican National Convention started, four candidates had delegates, and no one had a majority of the delegates. In Nov., Reagan won about 40 states.


24 posted on 10/14/2011 2:44:46 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Blood of Tyrants; freeangel; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; campaignPete R-CT; ...

The biggest problem with a national primary day is tha tthe candidate with the most money would almost certainly win. It would be almost impossible for a candidate to have grass-roots efforts in all 50 states, and an insurgent wouldn’t be able to, for example, win in Iowa or New Hampshire or South Carolina and then have enough time to raise funds and compete in other states. While it doesn’t seem fair that IA and NH always go first, it would be far worse if all 50 states voted on the same day.


25 posted on 10/14/2011 3:00:12 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PhilCollins; Impy

Having a national primary day (of course the “states rights” crowd will scream about that scenario unless all 50 states adapt the same day one by one), then awarding delegates based on percentage of the vote won in each state seems like the best scenario to me. Right now it’s based on countries won or something, so McCain got 54 out of Illinois’ 57 delegates, despite the fact he only won 48% of the popular vote in the primary. The breakdown in 2008 for the Illinois primary was like this:

John McCain 426,777 - 47.45% - 54 delegates
Mitt Romney 257,265 - 28.60% - 3 delegates
Mike Huckabee 148,053 - 16.46% - 0 delegates
Ron Paul 45,055 - 5.01% - 0 delegates
Rudy Giuliani* 11,837 - 1.32% - 0 delegates
Fred Thompson* 7,259 - 0.81% - 0 delegates

*Candidate withdrew prior to the primary

I suppose under the alternate plan, Ron Paul’s 5% of the vote would entitle one or two of his nutty Illinois supporters to become delegates to the convention, but he still wouldn’t get anywhere close to the nomination. Besides, if the GOP convention has 5% Paul loons advocating for him, that prevents them from doing what they did in 2008 and having their own convention since the GOP nominee was decided before the convention started.

There might be an occasional outcome like Rahm Emanuel’s mayoral bid where some candidate gets over 50% of the delegates during the national primary and is thus assured of being the party nominee before the convention opens, but more likely than not you’d have 5 or 6 candidates going into the convention and you might see some wheeling and dealing during the convention where the third place guy throws his suppport to the second place guy so together their delegates outnumber the first place guy. That WOULD make conventions more exciting and harken back to the surprise picks of the 19th century, although a drawback would the guy with the biggest number of delegates going to the convention would complain he was robbed and his supporters would resent the process.

Personally, I’m tired of having no say in picking the candidate because the race is over by the time my state votes. Even when we had the insanely early Feb. 2nd primary so Illinois could be part of “super tuesday”, half the candiates had dropped out before any Illinois citizen got to weigh-in on who the candidate should be.

All 50 states should get a chance to vote on every announced GOP primary at the start of the primary season. But Iowa and NH will scream bloody murder if anyone moves to stop them from deciding the GOP nominee for the rest of teh country.


26 posted on 10/14/2011 3:10:11 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

The ruling class would say that it is doing is so that it can be a weeding out process so that the candidates won’t have to raise enough money to run nationwide in a primary.


27 posted on 10/14/2011 3:17:17 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy; BillyBoy; randita; darkangel82; Clemenza; Clintonfatigued; Crichton; ...

I can’t recall if I mentioned it before, but I think there should be primaries held perhaps 5 at a time over a 10-week period. Divide the country up into 5 sections geographically with 10 states each (or by population, again divided into 5 groupings), with a lottery held to determine the order in which they participate from each section (with no more than 1 per section). No state should be “guaranteed” to have a first in the nation as New Hampshire does, it is unfair and absurd.


28 posted on 10/14/2011 3:19:34 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Rick Perry has more red flags than a May Day Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All

Cain’s stand is “I will boycott NV but still hold events there.” Makes as much sense as RNC rules or..9-9-9.


29 posted on 10/14/2011 3:28:07 PM PDT by redreno (Americans don't go Gault. Americans go Postal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

No, there is still pressure being put on to get states like Fla to move back their primaries and move the entire season back.

Romney pulled some strings to get as many primaries as possible to move up, because the believes it is to his advantage to hold the primaries before a concensus alternative to Romney emerges.

It is very much to Cain’s advantage for the primaries to be moved back to their old schedule.


30 posted on 10/14/2011 3:34:17 PM PDT by Brookhaven (999 Tax Calculator: http://goo.gl/AHsjH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

That wouldn’t be as bad as a national primary, that’s for sure. Of course, the hard part will be how to enforce it—NH would just hold their primary in January even if no delegates would be seated and the candidates would be too scared to ignore it (and the media would cover it).


31 posted on 10/14/2011 3:37:15 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Impy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; campaignPete R-CT

“It’s really the only way to give everyone an equal say.”

Yes, I agree. There’s really no reason IA and NH should hold so much “sway” over the rest of the nation.


32 posted on 10/14/2011 3:42:30 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (And who doesn't have baggage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: magritte

On paper they will penalize them just like Florida. In the long run they will vote at the convention not to impose the penalty. In the short term it will blunt some of the immediate impact of the causcus. In the long run all it will do is extend the race if it is close.


33 posted on 10/14/2011 5:18:28 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; PhilCollins; GOPsterinMA

Federal intervention may be the only way, and of course the validity of that would be challenged in court. Or perhaps the RNC could mandate a change on it’s own somehow. (I don’t give a crap about what the Dems do but didn’t Hillary win the popular vote? ;d)

If all of the candidates ever got together and boycotted IA and NH........yeah like that would ever happen. ;p


34 posted on 10/15/2011 12:21:34 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: magritte

>> States can caucus or have a primary when they please

Even if to advance a Romney agenda at the expense of further debates? Beware the establishment games.


35 posted on 10/15/2011 12:25:26 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Save a pretzel for the gas jet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Impy; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; PhilCollins

“Or perhaps the RNC could mandate a change on it’s own somehow.”

Yes, but they want Milt, so they aren’t going to do squat.

It’s a great idea though, as getting the Feds involved is a bad idea IMO.


36 posted on 10/15/2011 8:13:17 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (And who doesn't have baggage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson