Santorum is wrong.
States get to decide but cannot impose it on other states.
If you get married in New York, then move to Texas, you are no longer married.
A marriage license is not equal to a driver’s license, otherwise my concealed carry license would be forced on every other state.
The only problem is, eventually, liberal federal judges may force homosexual marriage on those states which don’t allow it.
For now, you are right about how these licenses are recognizd in the states, and for now, states are going to decide how to define marriage. But the long term goal of the gay activists is to force this through the courts on all 50 states.
You can’t talk about homosexual marriage and states rights and those issues, without being realistic that the stated goal of the activists is to force it through the federal courts.
Whether they will ultimately succeed in getting the U.S. Supreme Court to impose homosexual marriage nationwide is unknown at this time. But that is the ultimate goal of those activists.
No, you are wrong. Full faith and credit is all the excuse federal courts need to nationalize homosexual encroachment on the institution of marriage. anybody with two eyes and a perfunctory knowledge of federal courts should be able to see that.
“If you get married in New York, then move to Texas, you are no longer married.”
Does that go for normal couples as well?