[Conservativegreatgrandma]

Relax, I support whomever is the Republican nominee and I'm trying to make a point to those here on FR who have been ripping Perry because he had money and they are holding up Cain as a symbol of virtue because he has no money.

But now, if money starts flowing to Cain, it will be a good thing.

I have been supporting Perry because I believe he has a good record of governing in TX and evidently enough agree they have been supporting him with their dollars but I'm not married to this idea.

The hatred I see here on FR is very disheartening. It's that unless you agree with them, you deserve to be bullied.

We have a very important election to win. Obama and the RATS are destroying this country but our side either insists that our nominee is 100% acceptable or I'm staying home. That is surrender and I refuse to participate.

I want our strongest candidate possible. If it's Cain, it's OK with me. May the best man win.

[Allegra]

The hatred I see here on FR is very disheartening. It's that unless you agree with them, you deserve to be bullied.

You might want to have a look in the mirror, Honeybunch.

[rob777]

"I'm trying to make a point to those here on FR who have been ripping Perry because he had money and they are holding up Cain as a symbol of virtue because he has no money."


Some of us who support Cain never had a problem with Perry attracting a lot of money, nor saw it as a virtue that Cain had little money. Actually, attracting money could be seen as a sign of support for the candidate's agenda if it is not tied to political favors. What I do see as a virtue on Cain's part is how effective he has been given the scarcity of resources he has.