Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNnice

Go read: http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.146770/gov.uscourts.dcd.146770.39.0.pdf

Note the footnote:

“The Court is loath to dignify plaintiff’s allegations of fraud with a response on the merits. However, suffice it to say that plaintiff’s argument is premised on the incorrect assumption that Social Security numbers assigned prior to 1973 have any correlation to the recipient’s residence, see Employer Filing Instructions and Information, http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/stateweb.htm (“Prior to 1973, social security numbers were assigned by our field offices. The [first three] number[s] merely established that his/her card was issued by one of our offices in that State.”). Plaintiff’s entire premise is totally defeated by a cursory examination of this site, which demonstrates that plaintiff’s allegations lack any basis in fact.”


35 posted on 10/18/2011 10:42:15 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: El Sordo

The Supreme Court is loath to grant anyone standing in a case of forged documents relating to this President lest the facts brought forward by any plantiff might have some basis in reality. We are hiding from the Constitution here under our desks. “You are a citizen, therefore, you have no standing” is our new motto.


39 posted on 10/18/2011 11:10:01 AM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson