Replies

I suspect Romney would be worse than the kenyan. Both will hustle socialism. Both will have a Republican House and probably Republican Senate. Romney would get a lot more of his socialist agenda through that Congress than the kenyan could and Romney would cause the Congress to lose a lot of those Republicans in 2014 whereas the kenyan would cause the Congress to get even more Republican and a lot more conservative in 2014. Romney's USSC choices wouldn't be any better than the Kenyan's, either. Mitt would be obsessed with "working with" Democrats and proving his non-partisanship. He has proudly said as much already. Romney would be a one term president who gets replaced by a socialist who is more competent and farther left than the kenyan in 2016.
If Putin were running as a Republican he would NOT be better than Obama. It is the same with Romney. That said, I won't vote for the kenyan, even if the other candidate in the race is the Social Democrat Romney. I won't vote for a pro abort in any situation. I don't think the Republic can survive a 2012-16 presidency of either of these two Social Democrats in a form that any of us would recognize.