To: Clive
Hard to believe that the SCoC got one right. Every once in a while a blind squirrel finds a nut. lol
4 posted on
10/19/2011 11:45:10 AM PDT by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: Phlap
Yes, but don’t celebrate too much. Two of the justices wrote that if you write any text in your blog/website/post saying you agree with the information at the link, you are still liable for prosecution under Canadian defamation statutes.
Link only: no defamation; link plus endorsing text: possible defamation.
6 posted on
10/19/2011 12:09:53 PM PDT by
Captain Rhino
(“Si vis pacem, para bellum” - If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: Phlap
Got it right, by only half.
They placed a HUGE caveat in their decision.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson