And Cain's answer, while less than muscular, wasn't as bad as the title implies.
They were not “booing the soldier”. They were booing the question. Idiots.....
These “debates’ have been a series of farcical spectacles.
Count down until he says he was ‘joking’, ‘misspoke’, ‘doesn’t recall saying it’ or says he was ‘misquoted’ starting now!
I started out as a Cain fan but now every time he opens his mouth I like him less and less.
Faggot lib types are ADVOCATES of their behavior. I would not defend those activists.
Isn’t this story two weeks old, already?
I’m backing Cain but lately statements like this make me wonder about his judgement.
Cain is treading softly on the homosexual mafia subjects. They will take him down if they can, for they know he abhors the idea of “homosexual” marriage—as he stated over six months ago and has been attacked on that issue ever since. He is traditional.
Homosexual “marriage” is such a silly concept, since it is only about validating urges of putting one’s body parts or other objects into cavities that only produce disease and nihilism. For homosexuals demanding the ability to redefine thousands of years of tradition by calling their sick relationships—”marriage” to validate vile, demeaning acts and urges perpetrated on a human being and call it “love” is beyond rational thinking and should be discouraged through the legal system.
You have numerous cases of real “love” which doesn’t demand defiling bodies for ones lust—such as the love of a mother for her child. There need not be any laws demanding they be allowed to get “married”.
Forcing others to validate such sick, demeaning behaviors is unconstitutional and destroys the concept of our Constitution—that there are laws of nature and nature’s God—where our Natural Rights are given. We can not allow an atheist, Satanic view of the human body to destroy the concepts of the Constitution.
The stupidity of the left is beyond belief....all their ideas are bankrupt and if debate is allowed (political correctness is Marxism) they would be in the ash heap of history.
You know why he didn’t? You know why nobody did?
Because they boo’d the question and everyone there knew it.
The “debates” are a good indication of what we will end up with if we were electing someone to be head of our debate class if that class used these same silly debate forums you see on TV. But we are not doing that. To me the so-called debates are just part of the picture.
In the scheme of things this is old news. From October 2. I saw the questions and heard some boos during the debate. So what? What we are really dealing with here is the media setting the standard for how humans see homoesexuals and how we are “supposed” to react to them. As usual, the media wants everyone involved to say being queer is A-OK and let’s not look at what the gays do with each other physically. In this case they get the benefit of adding that the sicko was a member of the military. As if that changes things. It does not to me. I say being in the US armed forces is great. Being a homo is not.
Never has such a small part of the population received so much damn attention just because they eat poo-poo....
It’s okay Herman. Your not getting the homo vote anyway.
Look, no offense, but it _is_ old news. If we were to go ahead and post articles that are up to two weeks old, we’d be inundated.
Cain needs to stop all the backpedaling. It’s not going unnoticed and it is looking like a trend. Not good.
We ALL know they were booing the question. When is someone going to backtrack because they didn't defend a Christian?---don't hold your breath unless you look good in blue.
Freepers who've never backed Cain will say he's a sell-out.
Freepers who've never backed Cain, but can't be honest about that will say "I used to be for Cain, but...".