Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne
This admin said they wanted immunity for the troops..........................since when do they care about the troops?

Politically, it's a hot potato. Losing immunity in Iraq means other host countries will demand the same conditions, which becomes a huge political liability for Obama. Then there's the issue of GI's getting arrested and tried on host country soil. That has the potential to generate very ugly headlines for Obama, from a political standpoint. To the extent that Obama wants to be re-elected, he has to insist on immunity, whether or not he personally believes GI's should be immune from host country laws.

15 posted on 10/23/2011 3:32:57 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

I bet if Bush was still in office, we would have gotten the soldier immunity.


16 posted on 10/23/2011 3:34:02 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

We should NOT have troops stationed in all these places anyway.

Troops in Western Europe and Korea, and scattered about the globe for logistical support (Diego Garcia, Guam, etc.) is fine. The rest need to come home.

All these “Poke-a-goat-a-stans” can go rot.


22 posted on 10/23/2011 4:12:31 PM PDT by noprogs (Borders, Language, Culture....all should be preserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson