[FreeReign]

You are attempting to claim he said the government has no right to force a woman to raise a child of rape and I am saying that is ridculous because there is no place anywhere that the government says, suggests, forces, or even attempts to force a woman not to raise a child of rape. To believe that was what he meant was to state that Herman set up a straw man to knock it down.

Go look at the question Cain was asked. He was asked about "bringing up" the child in plain English.

Read the damn question!!

[McGavin999]

I know what the question was, why did he answer that it’s not the governments business to tell the family what to do. His ANSWER is where the problem arises, as was his answer on Stossel, and again this morning on FOX where he said he was pro-life but it’s not the governments business. That is the SAME position of John Kerry and Ted Kennedy. Now you want to support someone who is not a strong supporter of life, that’s your business but don’t try to tell me he stands for life when all he has done for days is retreat.

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

You can watch the whole exchange here: http://theiowarepublican.com/2011/do-we-really-know-who-herman-cain-is/

[CharlesWayneCT]

You should read what Cain SAID he took the question to mean, and what his answer meant. He didn’t think it was about adoption, and he didn’t answer it that way. He said it was about abortion, and he explained his answer.

But I guess Cain is lying about it as well? When you don’t even accept your own Candidate’s explanations, and substitute your own hypothesis instead, you have to ask yourself why you’d rather make things up than believe your own candidate.