[Eleutheria5]

I better not walk to my bathroom to puke. A terrorist might get me.

[knarf]

She's not your ancestor, or a religious figure, or part of your history ... she's your grandmother!

Go and visit and bring AK's and let the world condemn you for it.

There's a remnant still ... you're not alone.

[DJ MacWoW]

Remember How You Felt Before Finding FR?

Click The Pic

[Zionist Conspirator]

You know, it's absolutely bizarre. The Jewish claim to 'Eretz Yisra'el is based on the assumed accuracy of the Bible, yet many Jews (especially in the United States) won't make that argument because they seem to be allergic to "Biblical literalism."

I actually read a comment to an article in (I believe) the Jerusalem Post that said Jews don't like Evangelicals because of their "literal interpretation" of the Bible. Excuse me? Come again???

How did Jews become allergic to their own holy book and to their oldest and most valid claim to 'Eretz Yisra'el? I can understand if the writer was referring to the literal interpretation of the "new testament," but I doubt very seriously if that was the intention (he could have said "their literal interpretation of the new testament" but did not). Most attacks on "Biblical literalism" have nothing to do with the "new testament" at all but are instead condemnations of the literal interpretation of Genesis. Isn't that the book where G-d gifted the land to Abraham and his descendants? Isn't it the book that tells of the death and burial of the 'Avot and 'Immahot?

For Jews to war against "Biblical literalism" when they're having to against Arab/islamic claims that there never was a Temple in Jerusalem is simply psychotic.