“Hey Steve, Anita and I are having trouble coming up with a plan. Can you help us out?”
...said the oh-so-clever newbie who likes to put up threads from sources such as The New Republic as if they are gospel.
No media-bias-BS there. Nope. No siree.
2 days, huh? If you had more history, you might have seen this on past FR threads: From Fed Up!: Our Fight to Save America from Washington:
When the federal government oversteps its authority, states should tell Washington that they will not be complicit in enforcing laws with which they do not agree. Again, the best example is an issue I dont even agree withthe partial legalization of marijuana. Californians clearly want some level of legalized marijuana, be it for medicinal use or otherwise. The federal government is telling them they cannot. But states are not bound to enforce federal law and the federal government cannot commandeer state resources and require them to enforce it. So good luck to the federal government if it wants to enforce every law on its books without the help of state and local law enforcement. When the federal government oversteps its bounds, states should think hard about whether a single state resource should be committed to carry out the intrusive policy in question. (p.177)
********************************
First, we must restrict federal spending. Rampant and wasteful spending in Washington is an affront to both freedom and federalism. The most important thing we could do is amend the Constitution now to restrict federal spending. There are generally thought to be two options: the traditional ― balanced budget amendment‖ or a straightforward ― spending limit amendment, either of which would be a significant improvement. I prefer the latter. It is imperative that we establish a constitutional requirement that the federal government live within its means like states and most American households must dobut I dont want the Washington establishment to hide behind tax increases to ― balance‖ the budget. Lets use the peoples documentthe Constitutionto put an actual spending limit in place to control the beast in Washington. (p. 180-181)
******************************
Second, we should restrict the unlimited source of revenue that the federal government has used to grow beyond its constitutionally prescribed powers. One option would be to totally scrap the current tax code in favor of a flat tax, and thereby make taxation much simpler, easier to follow, and harder to manipulate. Another option would be to repeal the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution (providing the power for the income tax) altogether, and then pursue an alternative model of taxation such as a national sales tax or the Fair Tax. (p.182)
Stop whining.