Replies

“There are some allegations being made in the briefs that are not true, like his travel to Pakistan. It has shown that one could enter Pakistan at that time. And there is even some strong evidence he worked for the CIA and of course there would be no passport problems with that.”

An NY Times travel reporter files a story telling of her travel in 1981:

http://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/14/travel/lahore-a-survivor-with-a-bittersweet-history.html

There was a travel advisory regarding Pakistan in 1981, not a ban:

http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/travel/cis/southasia/TA_Pakistan1981.pdf

I have seen no evidence at all that Obama worked for the CIA. Low level work in a company that might have been a front in some foreign branches doesn't count in my book. I personally went through the CIA security clearance process (I was not selected, but that is another story...I was given a “secret” clearance subsequently by another agency) and IMO Obama never would have gotten through it, nor did this man who is unqualified for anything useful (prior to law school) fit the profile of a CIA recruit!

Thank you FRiend. My point was to the LLF member that I found it troubling to insert language that states there was a travel ban to Pakistan when there wasn’t a “ban”. It does not look good to enter mis-information in a court brief.

I will trust you testimony on the CIA thing, it was not proven to me one way or the other but I wanted to bring it up that context because it is out there, as is the travel ban.

All that aside I think, IMHO, that a judge may just say, to a third party, hey you need to prove your assertions.....placing the burden of truth, or the revelation thereof off their desk and onto someone else’s....