To: ProtectOurFreedom
Recommend cutting that count from 168 to 20 at least - they would do best to cut it to less than 12.
Can you find the 'essentials'? Help the lady out - out of office - if she can't see the obvious.
15 posted on
10/27/2011 6:45:27 PM PDT by
Ron C.
To: Ron C.
I agree. I only see a handful of things that are even REMOTELY necessary. And even then you could cut those budgets by about 50%.
17 posted on
10/27/2011 6:48:07 PM PDT by
boop
("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/Ming the Merciless)
To: Ron C.
why cut to 12...............a hundred years ago it was zero.................and Washington State got along just fine............!!
19 posted on
10/27/2011 7:34:17 PM PDT by
Cen-Tejas
(it's the debt bomb stupid!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson