1 posted on
10/27/2011 6:54:07 PM PDT by
raptor22
To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...
2 posted on
10/27/2011 6:56:28 PM PDT by
raptor22
(Join me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
To: raptor22
The bastards “DEEM” they don’t exist.
3 posted on
10/27/2011 7:05:55 PM PDT by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: raptor22
4 posted on
10/27/2011 7:07:35 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: raptor22
Why don’t they just do away with the Freedom of Information act?
If they can deny an item exists the Act is neutered anyway.
Obama makes his own ruled, there is no authority over this clown. Congress should be closed up and at least save what that costs us.They are allowing this clown to make laws through regulations and EO’s and standing there with their thumbs up their butts.
6 posted on
10/27/2011 7:27:39 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: raptor22
Yeah, now we KNOW he’s from Kenya.
Americanize the Kenyan? What a laugh; more likely is that he’s KenyanIzing America.
Niiiice....!
8 posted on
10/27/2011 7:50:52 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: raptor22
We ought to call him Precedent Obama.
9 posted on
10/27/2011 7:58:41 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
To: raptor22
The only thing transparent about this administration is that they are clearly liars, deceivers and cheats. That they cannot hide. In fact, they do not even try.
10 posted on
10/27/2011 8:40:28 PM PDT by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: raptor22; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
The most transparent administration in history has struck another blow for opaqueness ... expanding its ability to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, as the new rule states, "as if the excluded documents did not exist."
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
11 posted on
10/27/2011 9:35:21 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: raptor22
I don’t see how such a “regulation” can in any way be legal. First of all, I don’t understand how agencies can protect themselves by issuing their own regulations to do so; and secondly, I don’t see how it can so blatantly flout the law.
This is Alice in Wonderland time, folks.
15 posted on
10/28/2011 2:47:19 AM PDT by
livius
To: raptor22
It is clear that there must be some incredibly DAMNING evidence floating around!
What’s the difference between 18 minutes missing on the Nixon tapes and hundreds of pages missing from the DOJ?
Oh, Watergate never involved MURDER!
16 posted on
10/28/2011 4:16:08 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Cain for President - Because I like the content of his character)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
