Something in common with ALL the previous scam artists pulling this crap in the past
Rossi needs to turn it on, let it run, let it be examined, and sit back and shut up and start counting the money rolling in. NONE of this drama would be necessary if it was real.
Agreed. I'd really like this to be true, but I believe that:
An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof.
Or if you prefer, you can substitute Carl Sagan's version: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".
Or Pierre-Simon Laplace: "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness".
Or David Hume: ""A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence".
Rossi needs to turn it on, let it run, let it be examined, and sit back and shut up and start counting the money rolling in. NONE of this drama would be necessary if it was real.
Agreed. All of this screwing around just screams: "scam!!". I really hope that it isn't. But, until I see it replicated by an independent evaluator, I'm not holding my breath.
I don't expect him to give up trade secrets. Just hand one of his prototype catalyzers to an independent lab and let them run their own tests to measure the output, free of any "assistance" from Rossi and his cohorts.
You were making that same argument 5 years ago ~ so far you haven’t caught anybody doing fraudulent LENR work ~ or you’d be using them as an example.