That’s obviously the most innocuous of the claims in the complaint, explained without any of the nuance or context by which, I would presume, the woman detailed it.
I don’t know. He could be innocent, he could be guilty, it could be a borderline case. But it’s two women, not one, and none of us knows the circumstances.
You’re not even a person who sees a glass half full as half empty, you see a glass full but has a 1/2 inch at the top not filled, and you’re complaining. I think it’s clear as day Cain did nothing wrong whatsoever and the BOD’s who accused him were losers who were after money.
If more details come out that prove me wrong, I’ll be the first to admit it. But many details have come out, and more and more this looks to be nothing but throwing crap that doesn’t exist and hoping it sticks.