Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody

“While the allegations were unfounded, the company decided to settle with her because it was cheaper than going to court.”

And that, in a nutshell is what has happened to American society: people would rather do what’s convenient than what’s right. I’ve spent 26 years as a litigator in one area or another, and the area that frustrated me the most was insurance defense, where we were directed to settle cases for “nuisance value” that should, could and would have been won.

“Loser pays”, anyone? I’m liking the idea more and more.

Colonel, USAFR


35 posted on 10/31/2011 7:20:35 AM PDT by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: jagusafr

Its not fair and not right but no one wants to fight a nuisance lawsuit.

A lot of people just want money and this is a good way for women to rattle the tin cup. And get away with a hefty settlement.

Usually sealed and with no admission of guilt or liability on the defendant’s part.

I’m betting this is what happened here.


47 posted on 10/31/2011 7:41:26 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson