Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyscribe

You mean forcing banks to lend to people who could not pay it back was a bad idea? Who knew!? It was obviously Wall Streets fault!


2 posted on 10/31/2011 7:13:54 AM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: icwhatudo

...and then the banks bundled them up into securitized assets and sold them all over the world, with the help of S&P’s and Moody’s who gave them a AAA rating. It was a great con.


3 posted on 10/31/2011 7:17:59 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

Well, since the banks got the government to subsidize their losses while retaining the notes it was a great deal for the banks.

The government is subsidizing private mortgage debt with public money. It’s a win-win for the banks and a lose-lose for the American people. The effect of their policy is to keep housing prices high, extending maximum indebtedness to Americans with losses covered by taxpayers.

It’s crony-federalism. Wakeup.


6 posted on 10/31/2011 7:20:58 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo

colluding with the banks to have them lend to high risk neighborhoods and then as a matter of policy looking the other way when the promissory notes were sold in bundles BECAUSE the banks were giving campaign contributions. (or then the bankers and insiders)


22 posted on 10/31/2011 8:39:15 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson