Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to Sign Prescription Drug Executive Order
ABC News ^ | Oct. 31, 2011 | AnnCompton

Posted on 10/31/2011 7:52:30 AM PDT by Beaten Valve

Using the legal force of an executive order, President Obama is taking action on the health care front as part of his pressure on Congress for action on his jobs plan.

White House officials say at a midday signing ceremony in the Oval Office, the president will address price gouging and the availability of prescription drugs. He will also endorse what he describes as bipartisan legislation awaiting action.

“The shortage of prescription drugs drives up costs, leaves consumers vulnerable to price gouging and threatens our health and safety,” an administration official says.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: drugs; obama; prescription
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: RC2
Anyway....here’s one thing people need to understand, and this is only one example.
Claritin: 10 mg
Consumer Price (100 tablets): $215.17
Cost of general active ingredients: $0.71
Percent markup: 30,306%

Wow, if ever there was a stupid argument... Here is another one for you.

F-22 fighter jet plans: 5 CDs
Taxpayer price: $10 billion
Cost of CDs: $2
Percent markup: Astronomical

You are paying for the R&D work, not just of the product, but of the products that didn't pan out.

And if you don't like it. Don't buy it.

41 posted on 10/31/2011 8:54:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chode

College costs up 900% since 1978.

I wonder when the college deans will be under the hot lights being grilled by Congress like oil executives.


42 posted on 10/31/2011 8:56:47 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
so long as there are RATS still breathing, never...
43 posted on 10/31/2011 9:01:57 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

Wonder what he is really doing? You can be sure it is not good for the American people.


44 posted on 10/31/2011 9:09:03 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

Yes we do, but our mark up is not 30,000% I can tell you that. The profit margin for distributors is between 40%-50% and for a store that purchases directly from us, their profit margin could be 100%. A little different from 30,000% I would say. I don’t understand you “horse (sh!t) relief” comment. Are you familiar with the product line or are you just spouting off?


45 posted on 10/31/2011 9:31:45 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

“Didn’t the Clinton admin. drive out drug companies from the US? There’s only like two left. My understanding was there were 19 major drug companies at the start of the Clinton’s reign and only two are left.”

You’ve got that right. Hillary was behind it. There was such a shortage of flu shots that year that many people were unable to receive them. We must NEVER FORGET.


46 posted on 10/31/2011 9:32:48 AM PDT by kitkat (Obama, rope and chains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

I’m guessing he’s getting ready to shake down the pharmaceutical industry for campaign contributions.


47 posted on 10/31/2011 9:35:05 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Didn’t the Clinton admin. drive out drug companies from the US? There’s only like two left. My understanding was there were 19 major drug companies at the start of the Clinton’s reign and only two are left.

I don't know what you consider a drug company, but there are numerous drug companies left in the United States. Merck, Pfizer, J&J, Lilly, Roche, Abbot, and a host of bio techs remain in the US.

48 posted on 10/31/2011 9:51:20 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Percent markup: 30,306%

Your post is so short-sighted, I hardly know where to begin.

When you purchase a pharmaceutical, you're not just paying for the "active ingredients." For most products, you're paying for years and years of research, clinical trials, and other operations in the pharma company developing the drug.

So, don't come to a thread like this, telling people "what they need to understand..." You're not qualified to speak on the subject.

49 posted on 10/31/2011 9:56:44 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Percent markup: 30,306%

Never heard of research investment, huh? Or testing and registration expense? Nor, evidently, are you aware of overhead, packaging, sales and marketing expense or any other business expenses.

Obviously, you know nothing of accounting. Nor anything about the pharmaceutical industry.

50 posted on 10/31/2011 10:06:45 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve
“The shortage of prescription drugs drives up costs, leaves consumers vulnerable to price gouging and threatens our health and safety,” an administration official says.

Any government effort to increase supply and drive down costs will inevitably result in even greater shortages and higher prices.

Remember how government "fixed" cable pricing? And ATM fees? And made homes "affordable"? Along with college?

51 posted on 10/31/2011 10:11:45 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

If Nexium cost half as much, people would likely buy 2-3 times as much of it. Instead they tend to only use it in emergencies, and not use it for more than half the time they could use its benefits.


52 posted on 10/31/2011 10:12:47 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Don’t jump to conclusions here. We own our own business. I know what things cost. We also work very closely with our chemists. I know what things cost. Pick a medical product and price it out at Costco....you’ll be amazed at the difference in cost.


53 posted on 10/31/2011 10:14:00 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

ABC radio news refers to this as “executive action” , which I’m told is somehow different than an Executive “Order”.

All I know is that it appears to be the the new way of doing things and we don’t need Congress any more.


54 posted on 10/31/2011 10:15:22 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (See ya later, debt inflator ! Gone in 4 (2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Support Free Republic

55 posted on 10/31/2011 10:28:32 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
We own our own business. I know what things cost.

Then you know that calculating a mark-up on the cost of active ingredients alone is misleading as hell.

The cost of "active" ingredients in a fountain Coke is about 3 cents. You pay 99 cents. Does that mean that Coke's profit is 3300%?

56 posted on 10/31/2011 10:50:30 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
If Nexium cost half as much, people would likely buy 2-3 times as much of it.

Omeprazole/Prilosec OTC is cheaper and works much the same. The root cause of countless health problems is eating too much.

57 posted on 10/31/2011 11:53:20 AM PDT by Reeses (Have you mocked a Democrat today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Don’t jump to conclusions here. We own our own business. I know what things cost. We also work very closely with our chemists. I know what things cost. Pick a medical product and price it out at Costco....you’ll be amazed at the difference in cost.

RC, sometimes when you find yourself in an intellectual hole, perhaps you should stop digging.

You made a fallacious statement about the costs of pharmaceutical products, and you follow it up with an equally hollow one, but I'll humor you. You initially implied that pharma companies were responsible for the high overhead, but in your latest example (Costco), you imply that the retailer is responsible for the markup.

You also claim to know "what things cost," but you remain stubborn to the fact that much of the cost for pharmaceuticals lies in the R&D costs. The material costs are miniscule in comparison.

58 posted on 10/31/2011 7:05:23 PM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson