I really don’t give a $#!t what Polutico has to say on anything. They are working full steam for the WH and there is no doubt in that. Jonathan Martin was the one who wrote that Palin was a diva and blew off interviews with Rush, Levin and Hanitty with out a shred of evidence. When the three called him out as a liar, he made no retraction. That is what they do there.
The problem I have is the admission that he knew about this all along if you go just by the Greta interview. He didn’t say that he researched this or called the lawyers or anything of the sort. He talked as though he knew the details all along. Having been involved in lawsuits of a business nature now and again over the past 15 years in my work, I remember all the details of these things no matter how small. It isn’t the baselessness of the allegations here. It is how Cain handled it in my opinion.
If this was a last minute allegation like the weekend before the 2000 election with the Bush DUI charge, it could sink a campaign with these changing stories. Give the full story once or don’t say anything. Posted elsewhere here today was a Laura Ingraham interview with her looking for clarity on this so I am not the only one who raised their eyebrow a bit in that Greta interview.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800870/posts
Apparently you do care what Politico has to say...