Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy

The USS Nimitz was delivered to the Navy in 1975, the USS George Washington, was built by Newport News Shipbuilding and was commissioned 4 July 1992. While I disagree with scraping any carrier group. I would pick a carrier that was 17 years older! I would then use the Nimitz carrier as a training platform at Pensacola NAS.


8 posted on 11/01/2011 11:06:38 AM PDT by Colorado Cowgirl (God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Colorado Cowgirl
I would expect that the USS Washington would be maintained in a higher level of readiness so that she could be taken out & readied in event of war or a future fleet expansion. The USS Nimitz is going to be decommissioned either way. I don't know that there would be that much savings to the USN when you consider that as a nuclear vessel she would require an engineering staff just to maintain the reactor. If they removed that there wouldn't be much point to the whole exercise.
9 posted on 11/01/2011 11:19:51 AM PDT by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Colorado Cowgirl
The USS Nimitz was delivered to the Navy in 1975, the USS George Washington, was built by Newport News Shipbuilding and was commissioned 4 July 1992. While I disagree with scraping any carrier group. I would pick a carrier that was 17 years older! I would then use the Nimitz carrier as a training platform at Pensacola NAS.

My guess is that this is based upon which ship is next for a mid-life refit.
11 posted on 11/01/2011 12:06:01 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Porkistan delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson