Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen dies in accident; was texting while driving [drove into tree]
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | November 2, 2011

Posted on 11/02/2011 4:53:12 AM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: swpa_mom
"Pennsylvania is in the process of passing a law making texting while driving a primary offense, meaning a police officer can stop you for that in itself."

Agree that texting while driving is a very bad idea, but where do you draw the line and stop passing more new laws?


21 posted on 11/02/2011 5:27:26 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
Teens and texting (especially teen girls) is rampant. As a Mom with a son who is about to take driving lessons.... so much to fear.

Not having a cell phone or other texting-enabled thingie reduces the risk of this particular error.

22 posted on 11/02/2011 5:30:25 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm sure your dog likes you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grundle

A must see for every young driver.

AT&T Don’t Text While Driving Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DebhWD6ljZs
AT&T’s Txtng & Drivng Campaign Urges Consumers That ‘It Can Wait. This documentary featuring families affected by texting while behind the wheel is being distributed to educators, government officials, safety organizations and public as part of a educational awareness campaign.


23 posted on 11/02/2011 5:32:01 AM PDT by TSgt (Legal Disclaimer: View my profile at your own risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

It is naive to think that cops will stop someone for texting and write them a ticket. The only way to stop the foolishness of texting and/or talking on the phone while driving is to make the phones inoperable if traveling at any speed greater than 1 to 2 mph. The technology exists, it is just not used because no one would willfully buy into it. The kid is just another Darwin candidate sorry to say.


24 posted on 11/02/2011 5:32:29 AM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

25 posted on 11/02/2011 5:34:10 AM PDT by TSgt (Legal Disclaimer: View my profile at your own risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54

I just feel sorry for the tree. It takes a long time to grow a tree. The parents should have known or probably knew that their kid was texting while driving. There needs to be a little more chlorine added to the gene pool. At least the kid didn’t hurt anyone else when they were being stupid. They won’t do it again.


26 posted on 11/02/2011 5:35:56 AM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

“... not having a cell phone... reduces the risk...”

I agree BUT what if you teen needs to call 911 or you for help? A lot of horrible things can happen out there (especially to a pretty teen girl). I guess a parent need to enforce “no texting or cell phone operation” while driving and really, really enforce it. By enforce, I mean threaten them with removal of the license if they are caught texting or talking on the phone. As a parent, I’d rather be seen as a total witch than a friend or pal.


27 posted on 11/02/2011 5:37:14 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

—Good. Another law. I’m sure it will help a lot.—

I use my old Fender Mytouch as an “iPod” in my car now. I was trying to mess with the controls to get the right song list and had to pull over. If I lived in a state where texting is illegal and had actually caused an accident. I would have been doing nothing illegal, but what I was doing was every bit as dangerous.

Like you said, another law, I’m sure it will help.

That said, it may actually prevent some of this texting and it may save someone in an oncoming car. I’m very much against helmet laws, but you do notice that people rarely wear them where they are not required. I think the same would happen here. But, unlike helmet laws this law is not so much to protect you from yourself. Rather, it is to protect other people from you.


28 posted on 11/02/2011 5:37:18 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

A better solution for the problem is a device that the technology for already exists.
A phone signal scrambler that turns on when the vehicle is in motion. Scrambles signal, phone no worky!
Stop car and the signal returns. Problem resolved.
The reason they will not do this?
Money. The phone companies want the cash generated by texts and talk time.


29 posted on 11/02/2011 5:37:43 AM PDT by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

“Clamshell” phone with 10 numbers and a couple of menu buttons - it’s all I have, and all any “teen” under my charge will have until they are living on their own.


30 posted on 11/02/2011 5:41:28 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Whats with the high horse? I know someone who DID lose a teenager to drunken driving. The kid was involved in a two car accident, he died, but the driver of the other car was not seriously injured. When the parents told me the story, they specifically said they were grateful that the other passenger did not get hurt. That would have been even harder to live with.

So take that for what its worth.

31 posted on 11/02/2011 5:42:50 AM PDT by Paradox (The rich SHOULD be paying more taxes, and they WOULD, if they could make more money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

“... FR is attracting more sanctimonious hand wringer than ever”

I don’t understand what this means? If someone states that it is sad that a 17 year old girl is dead... are they a hand wringer? Is viewing the loss of a young person “over the top”? The day that FR as a whole laughs or high-five’s when a child is killed... we’re done. Teens do stupid things. Heck, five year olds do stupid things. When they do something immature or stupid and DIE... it is still a loss to their parents.


32 posted on 11/02/2011 5:43:48 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
You can't legislate common sense. Does anyone with more than two functional brain cells think that a law agaisnt texting would have made any difference?

Sure you can. For example; tough drunken driving laws make a huge difference...it practically killed the nightclub business. It didn't stop all drunks, but it got the attention of otherwise responsible people.

if you're stupid enough to text while driving then you might have to pay the consequences.

Which, if it is a thousand dollar fine, is a lot less serious than getting killed or killing someone else. Some jail time wouldn't bother me one bit.

33 posted on 11/02/2011 5:43:51 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ( Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

MOst newer cars have bluetooth setups that allow hands free operation of the phone — both calls and text. MY Hyundai will allow me to text message through voice activated commands.


34 posted on 11/02/2011 5:46:01 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to preserve it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
I agree that all “distracted driving” is bad, however, the amount of lives being lost to this modern phenomenon is alarming to say the least. I dont know...I dont believe this is a personal liberty issue as much as it is a public safety one. It is illegal to consume certain levels of alcohol/drugs as they may alter perception and judgment to a point that endangers your safety and the safety of others while operating a motor vehicle, how is this different? Again, I know that all distracted driving creates a potential danger, but they just are not finding many open road maps or lipsticks beside victims of motor vehicle accidents these days.
35 posted on 11/02/2011 5:46:13 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grundle
I was at a Rite Aid drug store last night to get scripts for my bad flu, and a prescription a dropped off at 10:00AM was still not filled when I got there at 8:00PM. They apologized and explained how they were sooooo busy they didn't get to it.

I then observed that two of the three pharmacy techs who fill prescriptions were actually texting messages in chat with other people on their cell phones. They had them placed immediately beside the keyboards of their computer terminals. To a casual looker, they just seemed to be doing their computer work. The two techs filled two prescriptions in thirty minutes combined. One managed to down a bag of nut cluster granola and a soda while texting and filling a script combined with picking her nose several times.

Of course Rite Aid has a fifteen minute fill guarantee which I did not ask for the reward, but they just give to everyone as a five dollar store credit for the wait. It's not pro-rated for the ten hours though.

We're all doomed.

36 posted on 11/02/2011 5:48:25 AM PDT by blackdog (The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
I don’t understand what this means? If someone states that it is sad that a 17 year old girl is dead... are they a hand wringer?

You missed the context here. The post was about someone jumping on a poster who said that it was good she did not kill or maim anyone else. The poster who said that said it was a shame she died.

37 posted on 11/02/2011 5:48:50 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to preserve it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

AMEN! Or, if you are under 25 years of age, the cell phone (like an unsealed booze bottle)out of the drivers compartment of a vehicle.


38 posted on 11/02/2011 5:49:33 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Signal scramblers are illegal and what about non-driving passengers?

A better solution would be to require all cars manufacturers to provide hands free integrated radio systems that facilitate calls but not texts.

Or voice to text messages, my phone already does this but then again why not just call the person? LOL!


39 posted on 11/02/2011 5:50:15 AM PDT by TSgt (Legal Disclaimer: View my profile at your own risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: grundle

BFF has some real meaning now huh?


40 posted on 11/02/2011 5:50:56 AM PDT by blackdog (The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson