"Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe."
--U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein Associated Press 11/18/93
Yes, that Dianne Feinstein.
Of course, when it comes to royalty, the rules change.
"Because less than twenty years ago I was the target of a terrorist group. It was the New World Liberation Front. They blew up power stations and put a bomb at my home when my husband was dying of cancer. And the bomb didn't detonate. ... I was very lucky. But, I thought of what might have happened. Later the same group shot out all the windows of my home.""And, I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that's what I did. I was trained in firearms. I'd walk to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out, I was going to take them with me."
Diane Feinstein, April 27, 1995
Classic hypocrital dem elitist.
bttt
This was always the goal of Fast and Furious. But, as with all bad crap coming out these days, was also done during the Bush administration.
NO MORE RINO’S!
if the US had gun laws and unarmed citizens like in Mexico the bad guys would still have guns, but the good guys wouldn’t how stupid can liberals be?
In case it hasn’t been done already...
BANG!
Who couldn’t smell this one coming?
Dumping on the gun-owners Nanny State PING!
Feinstein can kiss my Texas arse.
This is precisely their goal. Create a problem and then trample individual liberty to “solve” that problem, creating more problems that require more losses of liberty for more solutions that create more problems......
This standard can be applied to any liberal policy.
It’s not the lax laws that are the problem. It’s the lax voters that put this Marxist/Socialist/Communist/Liberal/Democrat/America hating b!tch into office.
Why hasn’t this scum been investigated for her scum husband profiting off of her being in the committee which steered contracts to her scum husband? Why is this dog still free?