[dirtboy]

Go check out what happened in the Yuma AZ sector where it was legitimately tried and was so successful they shut it down quick before the word could spread on how effective it was.

Part of the problem with what they did in Yuma is that it was not done in Tuscon, so we don't know if the illegals who would have crossed over in the Yuma sector simply went further east.

Oh, and BTW, there also is a triple wall in the Yuma sector now. Thanks for making my point for me.

[McGavin999]

There should be a wall where there is heavy crossing. There shouldn't be a wall in the middle of nowhere. Boots on the ground are the most effective tool in most places and a fence without troops is worthless. Hate to tell you, but you are not putting a fence on indian land I don't care what you do. The most effective methods are:

Fence in heavy traffic areas
Boot on the ground
Preditor drones

There is no point in only a fence and there is no point in attempting to put a fence in a river. There is also no way on earth you are going to get Texans to give over their water rights to Mexico by putting a fence on the Texas side of the river, and no way the Mexicans are going to let you put a fence on their side of the border.