Thanks, I stand corrected. As the flat tax plans are similar in substance, I assumed they were the same.
Forbes is Perry’s guy, so this still doesn’t make sense to me since Steve is editor in chief of the Magazine.
You understand little. Give me a quote from the book of John.
If you read the Forbe’s article, you will see that they were just extrapolating from what Cain told them, assuming Cain had evidence for his claims. They weren’t really making their own conclusions.
But also, he’s just the head honcho. I doubt he micromanages his reporting staff. And that’s a good thing.