Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat

WIlson did an interview AFTER the story came out.

Cain has been saying for WEEKS that things were going to come out against him now that he was in the lead.

I was saying that now that Cain was in the lead, the media was going to go after him.

We all knew it was coming. That doesn’t mean we were responsible for it.

But you keep saying things with no evidence, charging people with “wrongdoing” without presenting any facts, you are no better than those you claim to fight for smearing Cain with no evidence.

And since Cain himself contradicts you and blames Anderson, and you can’t give up your own accusation, so you try to put the two together in a bizarre story that has no basis in reality.

So, where are these links about Perry’s “people” saying something was in the works?

Or are you just going to point a third time to a post-”scandal” interview and pretend it has something to do with the politico story?

Until someone presents actual evidence, I’m going to treat your innuendo the same way I treat the women’s charges — ignore them as unfounded, and a smear against a good conservative candidate.


91 posted on 11/03/2011 9:21:49 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
Yes a smear against Cain is one against a good conservative man, but the Texas rino is not in that category. Perry is not fit to carry Herman Cains toilet paper. And that Wilson guy has 0 professional ethics.
116 posted on 11/03/2011 9:37:55 PM PDT by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson