Sounds to me like, a couple of women made allegations. There was an investigation where nobody could back up their stories, which basically means they put themselves in a position of being in a one-on-one, or two situation of their own consent and making. Then later figured out that since there were no witnesses, they could make up whatever they wanted to and make a little money off the NRA in the process.
When the NRA investigated and found no proof of their allegations, they decided to take no punitive action against the women and told them they could keep their jobs. Which got them NOTHING! The women knew they’d screwed the pooch in their job situation and started screeching like banshees about their pitiful situation. So the NRA offered them a deal if they wanted to quit with severance pay. Which gained them some nice dollars without ruining their employment reputations as long as they shut the hell up and get lost. Writers are a dime a dozen as well as troublemakers.
And of course this situation has the same effect as making deals with terrorists. It always comes back to bite somebody in the butt.
Which may be the reason no woman wants to come forward unless she can remain unidentified... If a scam paid off once and the perp got a year's salary without having to work for it, why not repeat the the procedure.
If she's ID'd, we can see if that has happened. I'm not saying we know that or that it happened, but there's some reason she MUST remain anonymous and not give enough details to ID her. Just something to consider.
An honest person doesn't have to worry about standing up for themself UNLESS they're standing up to a Democrat rapist, sexual predator, or harrasser. Speaking of which, I wonder how the Clintons are reacting to all the reminders of what they did and what they are.