Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heiss; P-Marlowe; wmfights; Cincinatus' Wife

That’s crapola Heiss and you know. Everything the man has said and done says that he’s for controlling the border and identifying those illegals who are here.

The High School program was IDENTIFYING the illegals among us and putting some controls on them and their parents.

Are we blind or what?

Here he is bring forth a program that would IDENTIFY the illegals among us, but not be foolish enough to attempt a mass deportation. It would involve a Visa program that would enable transfer back and forth for work, it would obviously call into question the whole anchor baby concept with those visa-bound immigrants readily admitting their allegiance to their country of origin, and it would require them to get in line with their compatriots who legally apply for US citizenship should they desire US citizenship.

It’s the most sane proposal I’ve heard yet about the illegals among us, and I’m in with it.


82 posted on 11/04/2011 8:40:42 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

His policy is for amnesty, period.

The end result would be massive influx of new illegals (oh, exceuse me, I mean new guest workers) in addition to legalizing millions of existing illegals (oh, excuse me, guest workers).

This means overcrowded schools, hospitals and increase in murder rates, DWIs, and all the other nice things that will enriched the lives ot “nativists” or “racists” as your side calls us law-abiding americans.


84 posted on 11/04/2011 8:50:19 AM PDT by heiss (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; heiss; P-Marlowe; wmfights; Cincinatus' Wife

Realistically we have to do something to place the parents of anchor babies under the jurisdiction of the United States. In addition to granting work visas and allowing these people to move freely to their “home” countries, we need to make a provision of this law that children of parents who are here on temporary visas are not citizens of the United States by nature of their birth.

Congress needs to define “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” to mean that only the children of parents who are citizens or who have applied for and received permanent residency at the time of their birth would be eligible for birthright citizenship.

Face it there are more illegal aliens who live in the United States now than there are residents of the United States who live under the Mountain time zone excluding Texas.

They aren’t going back to Mexico or Central America unless they know they can come back here without fear of being sent back or refused entrance.

I would not favor any such law, however, without a treaty with Mexico that would allow American Citizens reciprocal rights to travel and work in Mexico.


97 posted on 11/04/2011 9:07:15 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; heiss; P-Marlowe; wmfights; Cincinatus' Wife
It’s the most sane proposal I’ve heard yet about the illegals among us, and I’m in with it.

My thoughts as well.

I knew we would see the same old garbage from those who don't bother to read the article.

Perry is saying:

1. Secure the border first so we don't continue to have people coming illegally.

2. Do not give amnesty to those who came here illegally

3. Illegals would be given a visa. Now they will have to start paying taxes!

I would imagine that it is already a part of the visa process that if you commit any crimes after your incarceration you are deported. IOW, over time we could get rid of the criminal element. All in all it seems pretty rational. You can see Perry understands the issue and is smart enough to recognize the govt won't have the support to deport 12-15 million people.

132 posted on 11/04/2011 9:54:42 AM PDT by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

And who is your POTUS Republican candidate that you favor of the ones running now?


147 posted on 11/04/2011 10:39:05 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Rick Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

And who is your POTUS Republican candidate that you favor of the ones running now?


148 posted on 11/04/2011 10:40:49 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Rick Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson